2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2006.00592.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pretend play and parents’ view of social competence: The construct validity of the Child‐Initiated Pretend Play Assessment

Abstract: Background and Aims: Play is the primary means through which children develop skills and socially interact with other children. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between pretend play and social competence in 4-5-year-old typically developing children, thereby adding further knowledge to the construct validity of the ChildInitiated Pretend Play Assessment (ChIPPA). Procedure: The pretend play ability of 35 preschool children aged 4-5 years was assessed using the ChIPPA. Parent/ guardians… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
10

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
26
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The psychometric properties of the ChIPPA have been well established, including the test-retest reliability [42], inter-rater reliability [36,43], content validity and construct validity [41], discriminative validity [44], and sensitivity and specificity [44].…”
Section: Child-initiated Pretend Play Assessment (Chippa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The psychometric properties of the ChIPPA have been well established, including the test-retest reliability [42], inter-rater reliability [36,43], content validity and construct validity [41], discriminative validity [44], and sensitivity and specificity [44].…”
Section: Child-initiated Pretend Play Assessment (Chippa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ChiPPA's had a concurrent validity to measure the pretend play. Besides that, another study was confirming the construct validity for ChiPPA's (Swindells and Stagnitti, 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…, 창의성 (Dansky, 1980), 사회성 발달 (Gagnon & Nagle, 2004;Smilansky & Shefatya, 1990;Swindells & Stagnitti, 2006), 언어발달 (Garvey, 1977;Howes, 1992, Pelligrini, 1984, 그리고 마음이론 (Leslie, 1987) (Baumer, Ferholt, & Lecusay, 2005;Gmitrova & Gmitrova, 2003;Howes & Smith, 1995 (Adediwura & Tayo, 2007;Eggen & Kauchak, 2001;Pistoe & Maila, 2012;Westera, 2001 (Elbaz, 1981;Eggen & Kauchak, 2001;Wilson, Shulman, & Richert, 1987 (Richardson, 1996) (Bodrova & Leong, 1996;Cuffaro, 1995;Johnson, Christie, & Yawkey, 1999). 셋째, 기술은 유아의 학습을 촉 진하기 위해 교사가 교육을 통해 습득해야할 행 동적 측면으로서 (Irvine, 1997), 유아가 교육활동 에 지속적으로 흥미를 유지할 수 있도록 적절한 비계를 설정해줄 수 있는 교사의 교수 능력을 의 미한다 (Chong & Cheah, 2009;Shulman, 1986 (Enz & Christie, 1993;File, 1994;Neuman & Rokos, 1993) (Barone, Berliner, Blanchard, Casanova, & McGowan, 1996) (Spodek & Saracho, 1993), 매일의 일 상적 교육활동으로서의 놀이에 대한 이론 및 실 제는 교사교육에 있어 가장 우선시되어야할 내 4 Korean J. of Child Studies Vol.…”
unclassified