1967
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1967.01730210021004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presumed Minimal Brain Dysfunction in Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, we expected hyperactive CLD to have considerably quicker re sponse times than hypoactive CLD. From a previous study, 22 we hypothe sized that CLD as a group would have slower reaction times and be slower in comprehending simple instructions than controls.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, we expected hyperactive CLD to have considerably quicker re sponse times than hypoactive CLD. From a previous study, 22 we hypothe sized that CLD as a group would have slower reaction times and be slower in comprehending simple instructions than controls.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the past decade and a half, increased attention has been given by psychologists, educators, and medical specialists to problems variously identified as "minimal brain damage," "minimal brain dysfunction," and a host of other terms implying behavior deficit due to subtle central nervous system (CNS) disturbance (see Clements, 1966;Clements & Peters, 1962;Conners, 1972;Gomes, 1967;Knoblock & Pasamanick, 1959;Laufer, 1962;Laufer & Denhoff, 1957;Paine, 1968;Stevens & Birch, 1957;Stevens, Boydstun, Dykman, Peters, & Sinton, 1967;Thelander, Phelps, & Kirk, 1958;and Wender, 1971, among others).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fonte: (Clements, 1966) Questa descrizione incitò una moltitudine di pubblicazioni descrivendo casi di bambini con DCM e giacché l'etiologia di questa sindrome ha continuato a essere un argomento incerto, si speculò sulle possibili cause di specifici dati sperimentali. Tra queste, ci fu una pubblicazione che ebbe notevoli conseguenze (Stevens, Boydstun, Dykman, Peterson, & Sinton, 1967), infatti sottolineò che i bambini con DCM avevano un comportamento diverso rispetto a quelli dei controlli, e ciò fu interpretato come una leggera deviazione della funzione del sistema nervoso centrale (SNC), sia d'origine genetico o acquisito. Questa definizione riflette il cambio nel concetto eziologico introdotto con la nuova definizione del disturbo:…”
Section: Figura 2 Caratteristiche Della Disfunzione Cerebrale Minima unclassified