2021
DOI: 10.32598/jpcp.9.1.63.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prestige and Dominance as Differential Correlates of Moral Foundations and Its Clinical Implications

Abstract: Objective: How people use social rank (dominance vs prestige) could explain different attitudes toward five moral foundations. This study aimed to investigate the differential relationships between prestige, dominance, and moral foundations. Methods: This study was conducted on 150 participants who responded to the moral foundation questionnaire and dominance-prestige scale. Results: Multiple regression analysis revealed that prestige was positively associated with four kinds of moral foundations (harm/care, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, although dominance has been associated with less “likeability” (J. T. Cheng et al 2013), and more severe punishment by third-party individuals who see the dominant person as lacking in moral credentials (Kakkar et al, 2020), especially with regard to the moral foundations of harm/care and reciprocity/fairness (Khanipour et al, 2021), the use of collective opposition as a bottom-up approach to change moral regime has never been tested by rigorous psychological research.…”
Section: Dominance and Prestige As Morally Based Leadership Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, although dominance has been associated with less “likeability” (J. T. Cheng et al 2013), and more severe punishment by third-party individuals who see the dominant person as lacking in moral credentials (Kakkar et al, 2020), especially with regard to the moral foundations of harm/care and reciprocity/fairness (Khanipour et al, 2021), the use of collective opposition as a bottom-up approach to change moral regime has never been tested by rigorous psychological research.…”
Section: Dominance and Prestige As Morally Based Leadership Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%