SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 1992
DOI: 10.2118/24707-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure Transient Behavior of a Finite-Conductivity Fractured Well with Spatially Varying Fracture Properties

Abstract: The pressure transient behavior of a finite conductivity vertically fractured well is important in reservoir engineering because it provides valuable information concerning the well completion, and provides estimates of the in-situ reservoir properties and the propped fracture dimensions and conductivity. The pressure transient behavior of finite-conductivity wells has typically been analyzed using mathematical models that assume relatively simple fracture properties. Most of these models assume uniform fractu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For vertical fractures with dimensionless fracture conductivities less than the applicability of this solution procedure, a late-time formulation of the general finiteconductivity fracture solution 8 can be employed to readily compute the dimensionless productivity index solution for dimensionless fracture conductivities as low as 0.1. The low conductivity correlation values could also be derived using finite-difference reservoir simulation models.…”
Section: Dimensionless Productivity Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For vertical fractures with dimensionless fracture conductivities less than the applicability of this solution procedure, a late-time formulation of the general finiteconductivity fracture solution 8 can be employed to readily compute the dimensionless productivity index solution for dimensionless fracture conductivities as low as 0.1. The low conductivity correlation values could also be derived using finite-difference reservoir simulation models.…”
Section: Dimensionless Productivity Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…........... (6) The term in the second bracket represents the solution of the stationary problem with the distributed influx q(x, t) and the flow rate in the well Q(t). This is the case as the summation here is Green's function of the stationary problem (17,18,21) :…”
Section: Description Of the Fracture Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Great attention has been paid in the past, in particular, to modelling flow in vertically fractured wells (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xuejun Shan [7] explained the fracture geometry of the 21 CBM fracturing wells, the results show that there are three kinds of cracks in the form of expansion: single-wing cracks, asymmetric double-wing cracks, vertical and horizontal cracks symbiotic type, of which asymmetric two-wing cracks accounted for more than 90%. Many scholars at home and abroad have done a lot of research on this aspect [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], the domestic aspects, Wei Chen [8] established the evaluation model of finite conductivity and symmetrical fractured vertical wells in coalbed methane reservoirs; Weiping Ouyang [9] uses the finite element method to establish the numerical well test model of vertical fractured well of coalbed methane infinite conductivity, and the double logarithmic well test theory chart is drawn; Haitao Cao [13] used the theory of point source function to deduce modern decreasing plate of CBM symmetrically fractured well production; Baojun Cao [14] established a model for asymmetric fracture productivity of volcanic rocks based on the principle of conformal transformation and equivalent filtrational resistance; Wenjuan Wu [15] took the Chang 6 oil reservoir in Ordos Basin as an example, using the logging data to carry out the geological modeling and studying the three-dimensional stress field established the numerical simulation model of the asymmetric fracturing in the ultra-low permeability oil and gas reservoirs; Jian Xiong [16] derived productivity prediction model of finite conductivity asymmetric vertical fractured wells in low permeability gas reservoirs based on the steady flow theory and conformal transformation. The foreign aspects, Benjamin, J. and Barker [17] studied the pressure dynamics of finite conductivity symmetrical fractured vertical well in coalbed methane with confined boundaries based on the assumption of two dimensional single-phase Darcy flow; K.H.Guppy [18] established a numerical and semi-analytical model to analyze the high velocity non-Darcy's flow behavior of the finite conductivity fractured wells in coalbed methane reservoirs; Fernando Rodriguez …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foreign aspects, Benjamin, J. and Barker [17] studied the pressure dynamics of finite conductivity symmetrical fractured vertical well in coalbed methane with confined boundaries based on the assumption of two dimensional single-phase Darcy flow; K.H.Guppy [18] established a numerical and semi-analytical model to analyze the high velocity non-Darcy's flow behavior of the finite conductivity fractured wells in coalbed methane reservoirs; Fernando Rodriguez [19] established a semi-analytical model of finite conductivity asymmetrical fractured well in oil reservoirs based on a new solution to the dynamic analysis of quasi-linear flow and bilinear flow pressure; B.D. Poe [20] gave a dynamic analysis model of pressure propagation in finite conductivity fractured wells with the change of spatial properties; Sergio Berumen [21] gave a pressure dynamic analysis of finite conductivity asymmetrically fractured well based on the numerical solution. Lei Wang [22][23][24] gave progressive decrease analysis of finite conductivity symmetrically fractured well of coalbed methane and a well test model of finite conductivity asymmetrically fractured well in oil reservoirs based on Laplace transform and Stehfest numerical inversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%