“…This is because that in Hefei, the pressure is much higher than Lhasa. According to Kleinhenz et al, 17 the flame spread speed v f }P 2 g. This agrees with our experimental results. …”
This study provides an understanding of the fire risk of building's exterior wall geometry design at different altitudes. The influences of the U-shaped exterior wall geometry on upward flame spread over insulation material on plain and plateau were studied through laboratory-scale experiments. A hypothesis of pseudo chimney effect is provided. Results show that in both plain and plateau, the flame spread rate and the mass loss rate increase as the U-shaped geometry becomes deeper. The time for flame to propagate a certain distance follows an exponential decreasing trend, while it could be concluded that the upper and lower boundaries indicate the time for that of flat and enclosure geometry, respectively. Moreover, the flame spread rate is much higher in plain than in plateau. The key parameter is the upward flow induced by the air entrainment from bottom and front sides of the geometry which enhances the heat feedback.
“…This is because that in Hefei, the pressure is much higher than Lhasa. According to Kleinhenz et al, 17 the flame spread speed v f }P 2 g. This agrees with our experimental results. …”
This study provides an understanding of the fire risk of building's exterior wall geometry design at different altitudes. The influences of the U-shaped exterior wall geometry on upward flame spread over insulation material on plain and plateau were studied through laboratory-scale experiments. A hypothesis of pseudo chimney effect is provided. Results show that in both plain and plateau, the flame spread rate and the mass loss rate increase as the U-shaped geometry becomes deeper. The time for flame to propagate a certain distance follows an exponential decreasing trend, while it could be concluded that the upper and lower boundaries indicate the time for that of flat and enclosure geometry, respectively. Moreover, the flame spread rate is much higher in plain than in plateau. The key parameter is the upward flow induced by the air entrainment from bottom and front sides of the geometry which enhances the heat feedback.
“…The atmospheric flame is yellow whereas the low pressure flame is blue. The shape and color of the flame at low pressure are similar to those observed in microgravity tests [24,25], which is understandable since reducing the ambient pressure reduces buoyancy [26].…”
“…At present, most low‐pressure fire studies compare the combustion characteristics of the same fuel at different altitudes . The experiments were primarily done in Lhasa (altitude, 3650 m; pressure, P = 64.3 kPa) and Hefei (altitude, 50 m; P = 101 kPa), and a small number of fire tests were performed at three to four altitudes and in a low‐pressure chamber . The fire test fuel was classified into gaseous, liquid, and solid fuel, and similar conclusions have been reached: In higher‐altitude areas, the flame height, flame volume, ignition temperature, and ignition time increase, but the burning rate and flame pulsation decrease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the other method, which was to directly modify the environmental pressure parameters by software, the low pressure was usually accompanied by gravity changes, and there may be an error in the simulation. Based on the classical pressure model, the pressure‐gravity model was proposed by Kleinhenz et al On the basis of m max / D = f ( Gr ), P 2 g was kept constant, and different pressure level conditions were selected for the combustion simulation. The burning rate of combustibles was proportional to the characteristic length L. The ignition experiments of eight groups of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in different low‐pressure environments were simulated by McAllister et al using Fluent.…”
Summary
To solve the limitation of the fire test in high‐altitude areas only detecting a limited number of low‐pressure environments, in this paper, appropriate modifications of the FDS source codes were made to generate a new simulator program for low‐pressure applications. Standard fire experiments with different counts (1, 2, 18, and 27) of cardboard boxes were numerically simulated under different pressure levels (101, 90, 75, and 64 kPa). The computation data show consistent trends with the experimental results obtained in the low‐pressure tank at Lang Fang. Furthermore, the simulation results have been examined to show typical quantitative relationships: (a) The peak mass burning rate divided by the fire base dimension is correlated with the product of the pressure squared and the combustible characteristic length cubed. The exponential indices for the 1‐box fire, 18‐box fire, and 27‐box fire are 0.31, 0.29, and 0.29, respectively. (b) The heat release rate and mass burning rate show a good linearity at each fixed environmental pressure. In conclusion, the modified FDS is validated to work well under low‐pressure conditions, which can provide a receivable means to conduct low‐pressure fire simulation and analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.