1971
DOI: 10.1039/j29710002293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure effects and quantum yields in the photolysis of ethylene and propene at 185 nm

Abstract: Gaseous ethylene and propene were photolysed with varying amounts of added nitrogen, oxygen, and other gases. The product analysis and variation of yields with added gas are consistent with the major primary reactions (i)-(v) for which the primary quantum yields were estimated. Several other minor primary reactions were found. The C2H4 + hv(A = 185 nm) + C2Ha + H,; 4 = 0.68 -+ C,H2 + 2H ; 4 = 0.20 --t C2H3+ H; + = 0 * 1 6 C3Hs + hv ( A = 185 nm) + CH2:CHCH,* + H ; 4 = 0.41 + C2H3* + CH,; 4 = 0.36 reactions are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since neither SF 6 nor SF 5 CF 3 was able to react with propene in the dark, the photoreduction of SF 5 X in the presence of propene must be initiated by the excitation of propene. When exposed to VUV irradiation, propene would be excited into its continous → * band, and followed by dissociation into fragments corresponding to the following equation [29] C 3 H 6 184.9 nm −→ • CH 3 + • C 2 H 3 (1)…”
Section: Effect Of Irradiation Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since neither SF 6 nor SF 5 CF 3 was able to react with propene in the dark, the photoreduction of SF 5 X in the presence of propene must be initiated by the excitation of propene. When exposed to VUV irradiation, propene would be excited into its continous → * band, and followed by dissociation into fragments corresponding to the following equation [29] C 3 H 6 184.9 nm −→ • CH 3 + • C 2 H 3 (1)…”
Section: Effect Of Irradiation Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the studies of Borrell et al (1971) at 184 nm, of Lee et al (2003) at 157 nm as well as the theoretical study of Qu et al (2010), we considered the product yields to be those given in Table A.1.…”
Section: A7 Photolysis Of C 3 Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I1 en est de mCme pour les rendements quantiques des quatre derniers produits. Cependant il y a quelques diffkrences qu'il faut discuter : Ctant donnC que les quantitCs des radicaux mCthyles et vinyles formCes devraient Ctre les mCmes (rkaction [3]), les rendements des but-2-knes (rCaction [17]) devraient Ctre voisins de ceux des penta-1,3-diknes (riaction [18]) et les rendements de l'isobutkne (rCaction [12]) proches de ceux de l'isoprkne (rCaction [22]). (Les rendements quantiques du cis-but-2Bne avec l'addition de SF, nous semblent erratiques : l'augmentation observCe pour l'ajout de 5 1 Torr de SF, i 1,7 Torr de M n'est pas confirmCe ?I plus hautre pression (tableau I).)…”
Section: Partie Exphrimentaleunclassified