1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90132-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
2
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
11
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessing surgical risk, using the ASA classification, 47.8 % of patients were classified as ASA III and ASA IV, similar to the García-Crespo et al [23] series published using this scale. According to the literature, our constrained condylar primary arthroplasty outcomes are very similar to those published by Anderson et al [13], Martin et al [27] and Buehler et al 28]. Unstable valgus knees obtained somewhat better outcomes than the unstable varus knees.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Assessing surgical risk, using the ASA classification, 47.8 % of patients were classified as ASA III and ASA IV, similar to the García-Crespo et al [23] series published using this scale. According to the literature, our constrained condylar primary arthroplasty outcomes are very similar to those published by Anderson et al [13], Martin et al [27] and Buehler et al 28]. Unstable valgus knees obtained somewhat better outcomes than the unstable varus knees.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The average flexion achieved by this prosthesis was 107–115° 10–14. Similarly, cruciate retaining designs achieve a flexion of around 110–112° 1516. Although this was a significant improvement, it was not enough for daily habits like cross-legged sitting and squatting that are so common in the Indian subcontinent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The preservation type, in which posterior cruciate ligament is preserved, is considered better than the replacement type for performing functions, such as, climbing stairs, and has the advantage of simplifying revision surgery due to less loss of bone (Figure 2). However, knee joints with degenerative arthritis usually show soft tissue contracture, and when preserving the posterior cruciate ligament, the soft tissue balance is not easy to achieve, which possibly increases the risk of early failure due to polyethylene insert overloading caused by posterior cruciate ligament unbalanced tension [16]. When the posterior cruciate ligament substitution type is used, even degenerative knee joints with relatively severe deformities can achieve ligament balance, and when flexed at 60-70 degrees, the post of the tibial polyethylene contacts the cam of the femoral component and induces posterior placement of femoral bone, which allows relatively satisfactory rollback and can achieve sufficient knee joint flexion (Figure 3) [17].…”
Section: Posterior Cruciate Ligament Retention Versus Substitutionmentioning
confidence: 99%