2016
DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2016.00316.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presidentas Rise: Consequences for Women in Cabinets?

Abstract: Since 1999, women have democratically won the presidency eight times in Latin America and have named hundreds of ministers. This study argues that under certain conditions, presidentas are more likely than male presidents to improve women's cabinet representation. Two mechanisms, presidenta mandates and gendered networks, appear to drive the relationship. Furthermore, because the pool of ministerial candidates is shallower for women than for men, presidentas are most likely to advance women's representation in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They are also more likely to initiate bills related to women's rights, children, and families (Jones 1997;Schwindt-Bayer 2010;Taylor-Robinson and Heath 2003) and social issues, including education, healthcare, and welfare (Swers 2014;Schwindt-Bayer 2010). Women chief executives are more likely to appoint women to top bureaucratic positions, such as cabinet ministers at the national level (Reyes-Housholder 2016) and public managers at the local level (Funk, Silva and Escobar-Lemmon Forthcoming). A number of additional studies find that increasing women's representation results in the adoption of policy programs that favor women's substantive interests.…”
Section: The Consequences Of Women's Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are also more likely to initiate bills related to women's rights, children, and families (Jones 1997;Schwindt-Bayer 2010;Taylor-Robinson and Heath 2003) and social issues, including education, healthcare, and welfare (Swers 2014;Schwindt-Bayer 2010). Women chief executives are more likely to appoint women to top bureaucratic positions, such as cabinet ministers at the national level (Reyes-Housholder 2016) and public managers at the local level (Funk, Silva and Escobar-Lemmon Forthcoming). A number of additional studies find that increasing women's representation results in the adoption of policy programs that favor women's substantive interests.…”
Section: The Consequences Of Women's Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mounting research, however, suggests female presidents wield that power differently than their male counterparts. Not only are they more likely to mobilize their core constituents on the basis of gender identity and network with elite feminists (Reyes-Housholder forthcoming), to advance pro-women policies and gender equality (Waylen 2016), and to nominate more women to cabinet posts (Reyes-Housholder 2016), they are also less likely to govern by executive decree – especially when they are highly popular (Shair-Rosenfield and Stoyan forthcoming). The centrality of public approval to presidential politics, coupled with distinct governing styles of male and female presidents, make the following question a research imperative: does the sex of the president influence public evaluations of him or her?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender and politics research underscores how gender stereotypes fuel the perception that female political leaders lack the stereotypical masculine attributes (such as toughness, decisiveness) associated with leadership (Alexander and Andersen 1993; Huddy and Terkildsen 1993; Lawless 2004; Leeper 1991; Schneider and Bos 2014). Despite an explosion of research on female presidents (Martin and Borrelli 2016; Murray 2010; Reyes-Housholder 2016; forthcoming; Schwindt-Bayer 2018; Schwindt-Bayer and Reyes-Housholder 2017; Shair-Rosenfield and Stoyan forthcoming), how gender stereotypes influence their public standing remains unclear. Hence our study makes important theoretical and empirical contributions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En los años precedentes al 2018, la participación y representación política de las mujeres habían avanzado a grandes pasos. La primera presidenta de Chile, Michelle Bachelet (2006-20102014 nombró gabinetes (cuasi) paritarios y promovió políticas promujer como nunca antes (Reyes-Housholder 2016. Durante su último gobierno el Servicio Nacional de la Mujer (Sernam) se convirtió en el Ministerio de la Mujer y la Equidad de Género, se aprobó la ley de Interrupción Voluntaria del Embarazo en tres causales y se implementaron cuotas de género para candidaturas legislativas (Reyes-Housholder 2018;Le Foulon and Suárez-Cao 2019).…”
Section: Coyuntura Social: Desafíos Al Poder De Génerounclassified