Advances in Tissue Banking 2002
DOI: 10.1142/9789812776976_0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preserved Bone Allografts in Reconstructive Orthopaedics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these remain widely available and offer no donor site morbidity, there are notable risks and important shortcomings associated with their use. 5,6,7,8 Allogenic grafts carry the risk of resorption, immune rejection, and disease transmission. Synthetic grafts may be complicated by infection and extrusion.…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these remain widely available and offer no donor site morbidity, there are notable risks and important shortcomings associated with their use. 5,6,7,8 Allogenic grafts carry the risk of resorption, immune rejection, and disease transmission. Synthetic grafts may be complicated by infection and extrusion.…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limited amount of tissue possible to obtain in children, surgical procedures conducted during its collection and, additionally -in case of bone graft -the risk of no graft adhesion with the host's tissue and its resorption, emphasise the imperfection of this method (Rotter et al, 2005). Despite common use of allogeneic cartilage and bone in regeneration of defects, the limiting factor may constitute their availability and possibility of losing them (Komender et al, 2001;Więcko et al, 1980). Chondrocytes amplified in vitro and used in tissue engineering may undergo differentiation (Barbero et al, 2003).…”
Section: Xenogeneic Engraftment Of Antlerogenic Cells and Tissue Regementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The repair of craniofacial cartilaginous defects created by trauma, previous surgical resection, and congenital deformities requires analogous reconstructive material to obtain optimal results. Unfortunately, the use of synthetic grafts may be complicated by infection and extrusion, whereas allogenic grafts carry the risk of immune rejection and disease transmission . Autologous cartilage grafts as an alternative can be harvested from the nasal septum, auricle, and rib.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%