2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2013.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preservation of Mesoproterozoic age deep burial fluid signatures, NW Scotland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vein oxygen is commonly isotopically lighter than that of the host material ( Figure 3). A notable exception is cone-in-cone calcite hosted inside Proterozoic, organic-rich shale (Parnell et al, 2013). Apart from this example, oxygen is depleted within veins, relative to the host rock, and the absence of any general correlation likely reflects the control of the local temperature on oxygen fractionation.…”
Section: Stable Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Vein oxygen is commonly isotopically lighter than that of the host material ( Figure 3). A notable exception is cone-in-cone calcite hosted inside Proterozoic, organic-rich shale (Parnell et al, 2013). Apart from this example, oxygen is depleted within veins, relative to the host rock, and the absence of any general correlation likely reflects the control of the local temperature on oxygen fractionation.…”
Section: Stable Isotopesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…CIC structures have been found worldwide in Phanerozoic sedimentary rocks; however, they are rare in the Precambrian rock record (Cobbold et al, 2013). From the Precambrian, so far CIC calcite has been described from the Palaeoproterozoic of North America (Turner and Kamber, 2012), the Mesoproterozoic of Scotland (Parnell et al, 2014), the lower Ediacaran of the southern Canadian Cordillera (Smith, 2009), and the upper Ediacaran of Ukraine and Moldavia (Văscăutanu, 1931;Kopeliovich, 1965;Ivantsov et al, 2015;Nesterovsky et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Stoer Group is dominantly siliciclastic with few carbonate rock horizons (see Stewart, 2002;Parnell et al, 2014;Stueeken et al, 2017;Brasier et al, 2017). Notably there are layered carbonate units in the Stoer Group that have been interpreted as stromatolitic (Upfold, 1984;Krabbendam, 2011;Brasier et al, 2017), and these are the only potential macrofossils visible in the field, but their biogenicity has never been convincingly proven (Stewart, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%