2019
DOI: 10.7202/1070147ar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Présentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 103 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Embedded within a complex matrix of relationships or multispecies entanglements, human-wildlife interactions must be understood in connection to particular policies, places, institutions, and their historical trajectories [22][23][24]. Both theoretical perspectives contribute to a paradigm shift that is already underway in conservation practices, highlighting how conventional conservation has been informed by a modernist, humanist or Cartesian ontology based on the separation between the human and nature that is pure and can be preserved, and how this view has in some cases overlooked the possibility of other ontological entanglements, or socio-natures [21] (p. 501) [25][26][27]. Applying these perspectives to situated human-wildlife interactions enables us to consider alternative forms of human practices and knowledge production in relation to wildlife, as demonstrated by recent anthropological research on the entanglements between humans and wild cats in Asia [28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embedded within a complex matrix of relationships or multispecies entanglements, human-wildlife interactions must be understood in connection to particular policies, places, institutions, and their historical trajectories [22][23][24]. Both theoretical perspectives contribute to a paradigm shift that is already underway in conservation practices, highlighting how conventional conservation has been informed by a modernist, humanist or Cartesian ontology based on the separation between the human and nature that is pure and can be preserved, and how this view has in some cases overlooked the possibility of other ontological entanglements, or socio-natures [21] (p. 501) [25][26][27]. Applying these perspectives to situated human-wildlife interactions enables us to consider alternative forms of human practices and knowledge production in relation to wildlife, as demonstrated by recent anthropological research on the entanglements between humans and wild cats in Asia [28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%