2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2016.06.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Present status of the group contribution equation of state VTPR and typical applications for process development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They called it Chain-FV and using diverse ways to get the Cparameter, for example, as r/q (ratio of the vdW volume over area), they obtained improved results over the Flory−Huggins and the free-volume model of Elbro et al 80 for activity coefficients of alkanes, solid−liquid equilibrium calculations, and against molecular simulation data. When C = 1, the model results to the same "comb-FV" term proposed by Elbro et al 68 and also implied in the van der Waals equation. There are no rigorous approaches to predict the C-parameter, and different (rather similar values) have been proposed in the literature in models which use this parameter, like the UNIFAC-FV model by Oishi and Prausnitz 81 and the Flory equation of state.…”
Section: Journal Of Chemical and Engineering Datasupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They called it Chain-FV and using diverse ways to get the Cparameter, for example, as r/q (ratio of the vdW volume over area), they obtained improved results over the Flory−Huggins and the free-volume model of Elbro et al 80 for activity coefficients of alkanes, solid−liquid equilibrium calculations, and against molecular simulation data. When C = 1, the model results to the same "comb-FV" term proposed by Elbro et al 68 and also implied in the van der Waals equation. There are no rigorous approaches to predict the C-parameter, and different (rather similar values) have been proposed in the literature in models which use this parameter, like the UNIFAC-FV model by Oishi and Prausnitz 81 and the Flory equation of state.…”
Section: Journal Of Chemical and Engineering Datasupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This approach was popular at the start with models such as MHV1/MHV2 (Dahl and Michelsen 89 ) and PSRK (Gmehling 90 ), but it turned out that poor results are obtained for sizeasymmetric systems due to "changing in the wrong direction" the combinatorial-free volume term of the equation of state. These problems were corrected by semiempirical approaches such as LCVM (Boukouvalas et 68 Moreover, the MHV1/PSRK/MHV2 models are only "approximate zero reference pressure" models as the approximations introduced essentially change the reference pressure to an approximate zero one (see Kontogeorgis and Coutsikos, 50 for details). Thus, we believe that the infinite pressure Huron−Vidal approach is the most promising way forward (the approach also used in the Wong−Sandler and VTPR models).…”
Section: Journal Of Chemical and Engineering Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the broad spectrum of modeling approaches that have been considered for blends containing halogenated olefins, any survey will be necessarily incomplete. Equation of state approaches have included group-contribution volume translated Peng-Robinson (GC-VTPR), perturbed-chain polar SAFT, , cubic plus association (CPA), , and predictive Peng-Robinson (PPR78). , With very few exceptions, insufficient detail is provided in the literature to verify the performance of the proposed equations of state. While these models can in many cases provide adequate representation of the vapor–liquid equilibrium (especially the cubic equations of state), simultaneously representing all thermodynamic properties with a consistent model formulation is challenging.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the calculation of surface area fraction θ and group mole fraction X is given in Equations (13) and (14). The relative van der Waals group surface areas Q for the individual subgroups were either adopted from the PSRK model or adjusted for the VTPR model [5,16].…”
Section: Calculation Of Excess Enthalpy Using Vtpr Eosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The required pure component properties and the parameter for VTPR EOS were saved in an Excel file, which allows to use an extension of the program for other components in future. The data were retrieved from [1,12,13,16,19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%