2001
DOI: 10.1029/2001gl013091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Present day kinematics of the Eastern California Shear Zone from a geodetically constrained block model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
149
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
13
149
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, most other active ECSZ faults imaged in this data set exhibit low velocity gradients in the immediate vicinity of the fault, consistent with strain accumulation patterns around faults with larger locking depths of 10-20 km, the typical range of locking depths in this region (Meade and Hager, 2005;Miller et al, 2001;McClusky et al, 2001). For a series of sub-parallel strike slip faults that are relatively closely spaced, the corresponding overlapping strain fields have made it challenging to estimate independent slip rates from geodetic data; while the summed slip rate across the entire shear zone is well constrained, the individual fault rates are not.…”
Section: Geodetic Slip Ratesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In contrast, most other active ECSZ faults imaged in this data set exhibit low velocity gradients in the immediate vicinity of the fault, consistent with strain accumulation patterns around faults with larger locking depths of 10-20 km, the typical range of locking depths in this region (Meade and Hager, 2005;Miller et al, 2001;McClusky et al, 2001). For a series of sub-parallel strike slip faults that are relatively closely spaced, the corresponding overlapping strain fields have made it challenging to estimate independent slip rates from geodetic data; while the summed slip rate across the entire shear zone is well constrained, the individual fault rates are not.…”
Section: Geodetic Slip Ratesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Each fault segment makes up part of the boundary between two adjacent blocks (e.g., Souter, 1998;McClusky et al, 2001). The slip rate components on each fault segment are determined in an internally consistent manner by the projection of the relevant relative block velocity vector onto the fault plane (Fig.…”
Section: Block Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeled blocks here are similar to those defined by McClusky et al [2001] and McCaffrey [2005]. Block velocities in this region were all to the northwest and ranged from 8.0 ± 0.3 mm/a in block 30 to 11.8 ± 0.2 mm/a in block 29.…”
Section: Basin-range Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 55%