2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-009-9577-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in feral populations of Xenopus laevis in Chile

Abstract: Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) is a causal agent of disease and population decline of amphibian populations, and the extinction of several anuran species worldwide. Diverse hypotheses have been provided for the emergence of this fungus in different continents, ranging from global climate change to the vectoring of Bd via the international trade in amphibian species. In order to address these hypotheses, it is important to assess the current distribution of Bd in the context of introduced nonnativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Xenopus laevis has been associated with the emergence and global spread of the amphibian disease chytridiomycosis, caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis ( Bd ) [59], [60]. Recently, Bd has been identified in wild populations of X. laevis in Chile [61] and chytridiomycosis has been reported as a cause of mortality of R. darwinii in captivity [36], [43]. The impacts of Bd on sympatric wild amphibians, including Darwin’s frogs, in Chile have not been investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xenopus laevis has been associated with the emergence and global spread of the amphibian disease chytridiomycosis, caused by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis ( Bd ) [59], [60]. Recently, Bd has been identified in wild populations of X. laevis in Chile [61] and chytridiomycosis has been reported as a cause of mortality of R. darwinii in captivity [36], [43]. The impacts of Bd on sympatric wild amphibians, including Darwin’s frogs, in Chile have not been investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ron (2005) described specific regions in South America such as the Brazilian Atlantic forest, the temperate forest in Chile and western Argentina (south to 308 S), northeastern Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay. Later findings of the fungus in native and exotic species of nine countries in and around these regions support the hypothesis (i.e., Ron & Merino, 2000;Mazzoni et al, 2003;Seimon et al, 2005;Barrionuevo & Mangione, 2006;Carnaval et al, 2006;Fox et al, 2006;Barrionuevo et al, 2008;Ruiz & Rueda-Almonacid, 2008;Arellano et al, 2009;Borteiro et al, 2009;Ghirardi et al, 2009;Solis et al, 2009). In Argentina, the earliest evidence of this fungus dates from 2002 (Herrera et al, 2005), and since then new reports have expanded the extent of B.d.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…De las 17 especies animales vertebrados cuyo manejo ha sido considerado prioritario, gran parte de ellas fueron introducidas con fines domésticos (e.g., Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758; Cervus elaphus) o comerciales (e.g., N. vison). Otro caso que preocupa, es X. laevis, dado que se encuentra naturalizada y en expansión de su rango secundario en Chile (Lobos y Jaksic 2005), además ha sido identificada como vector de Ranavirus (Robert et al 2007) y hongo quítrido, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Longcore, Pessier et DK Nichols) (Solís et al 2010). Además se detectó que tres de los géneros que han sido introducidos entre el 2009-2015 a la fecha de introducción ya presentaban poblaciones natu-ralizadas (Nasua spp., Oryctolagus spp., y Sus spp.)…”
Section: Una Mirada Hacia Al Pasado Y Propuestas Para El Futurounclassified