2016
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presence of a loner strain maintains cooperation and diversity in well-mixed bacterial communities

Abstract: Cooperation and diversity abound in nature despite cooperators risking exploitation from defectors and superior competitors displacing weaker ones. Understanding the persistence of cooperation and diversity is therefore a major problem for evolutionary ecology, especially in the context of well-mixed populations, where the potential for exploitation and displacement is greatest. Here, we demonstrate that a ‘loner effect’, described by economic game theorists, can maintain cooperation and diversity in real-worl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…a, with a PA01 cooperator/cheat pair, and a type‐III siderophore producer; the same type produced by our 59.20 cooperator. The difference between the results probably reflects the differences in the costs of siderophore production, the proportion of siderophores shared or proportion retained for personal use (see Inglis et al ., ), which in our case did not have suitable values for the loner effect to occur.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…a, with a PA01 cooperator/cheat pair, and a type‐III siderophore producer; the same type produced by our 59.20 cooperator. The difference between the results probably reflects the differences in the costs of siderophore production, the proportion of siderophores shared or proportion retained for personal use (see Inglis et al ., ), which in our case did not have suitable values for the loner effect to occur.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Similarly, increased carbon availability reduces the relative metabolic costs of pyoverdine production, and thus decreases the advantage of cheaters (Brockhurst et al ., ; Sexton and Schuster, ). Finally, community composition was found to be a key factor determining who interacts with whom, thereby influencing the relative importance of competition versus cooperation (Griffin et al ., ; Inglis et al ., ; Leinweber et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While high cell density and diversity can create strong competition in the struggle for nutrients and space [1,2], it can also promote stable networks of cooperation [3,4]. A common way for bacteria to cooperate is through the secretion of nutrientscavenging metabolites, which are shared as "public goods" in the community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%