Abstract:Different from both finite‐time control (where the settling time depends on the initial condition) and fixed‐time control (whose settling time is subject to an upper bound but varies due to uncertainties and nonlinearities), the prescribed‐time control achieves regulation in prescribed finite time, even under uncertain nonlinearities. This article investigates the prescribed‐time regulation problem for a class of cascaded systems with integral form and control input constraints. The establishment of prescribed… Show more
“…Every control problem can be formed as a constrained optimization problem in MPC such that the control performance can be optimized without saturation happens. As the method termed explicit reference governor (ERG) for tacking problem developed in References 17‐20, the performance and control input constraints are converted into limitations on upper Lyapunov function (or the limitation in an invariant set), and the balance is achieved through the application of a trade‐off reference trajectory. The adaptive prescribed performance control in Reference 21 accomplishes a trade‐off between input limitations and output constraints, by relaxing the performance bounds of conventional PPC, when the saturation takes place.…”
Summary
This paper addresses the balanced control between performance and saturation for a class of constrained nonlinear systems, including the branches: balanced command filtered backstepping (BCFB) and balanced performance control (BPC). To balance the interconnection and conflict between performance and saturation constraints, define a performance safety evaluation (PSE) function, which evaluates the system safety under the destabilizing effect variables (DEVs) like saturation quantity and filter errors, then the cumulative effects of DEVs are fully utilized and compensated for the performance recovery. Specifically, there exists some degree of tolerance for the DEVs in the safety region, and the compensation operation works when the evaluation of the system goes dangerous. The advantages of the proposed methodology are illustrated in the numerical simulation.
“…Every control problem can be formed as a constrained optimization problem in MPC such that the control performance can be optimized without saturation happens. As the method termed explicit reference governor (ERG) for tacking problem developed in References 17‐20, the performance and control input constraints are converted into limitations on upper Lyapunov function (or the limitation in an invariant set), and the balance is achieved through the application of a trade‐off reference trajectory. The adaptive prescribed performance control in Reference 21 accomplishes a trade‐off between input limitations and output constraints, by relaxing the performance bounds of conventional PPC, when the saturation takes place.…”
Summary
This paper addresses the balanced control between performance and saturation for a class of constrained nonlinear systems, including the branches: balanced command filtered backstepping (BCFB) and balanced performance control (BPC). To balance the interconnection and conflict between performance and saturation constraints, define a performance safety evaluation (PSE) function, which evaluates the system safety under the destabilizing effect variables (DEVs) like saturation quantity and filter errors, then the cumulative effects of DEVs are fully utilized and compensated for the performance recovery. Specifically, there exists some degree of tolerance for the DEVs in the safety region, and the compensation operation works when the evaluation of the system goes dangerous. The advantages of the proposed methodology are illustrated in the numerical simulation.
“…The second category presented in References 15–25 designs a monotonically increasing time function (also called time base generator or scaling function) which approaches infinity at a predefined time. This time function is injected into controllers as a time‐varying gain so that the controllers can force the solutions of systems to converge to zero at this predefined time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, the predefined‐time control is still an open topic although the studies in References 7–28 have achieved successful and promising results. Motivated by the aforesaid research, this article introduces a novel performance function with the property of reaching its terminal value at a predefined time, and whereby develops a new predefined‐time tracking control scheme for a class of nonlinear systems, such that the system tracking error can converge to a given tolerant steady‐state error domain within a predefined time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our developed predefined‐time control scheme has higher compatibility compared to References 7–14 as it does not require a specific control design framework. This means that any control methods can be incorporated into our developed predefined‐time control scheme.Our developed predefined‐time control scheme does not cause the high‐gain control problem at the predefined time in References 15–25.Differing from the fractional power functions in References 26–28, our introduced performance function can directly and flexibly off‐line predefine a desired time required for the performance function to reach its terminal value, independent from its parameters. And our introduced performance function is a function so that it is applicable to arbitrary order systems.…”
It is well‐known that the finite‐time and the fixed‐time control can ensure the finite‐time and the fixed‐time stabilities of systems, respectively. Therein the finite convergence time depends on both the initial conditions of systems and the controller design parameters, and the fixed convergence time only depends on the controller design parameters. The recently reported predefined‐time control removes the above limitations. Nevertheless, the existing predefined‐time control methods either require sliding modes, or suffer from the high‐gain control problem at the predefined time, or cannot be applied to high‐order systems. This article develops an alternative predefined‐time tracking control scheme of a class of nonlinear systems by introducing a novel performance function which reaches its terminal value at a predefined time. The developed predefined‐time tracking control scheme has higher compatibility, does not cause the high‐gain control problem at the predefined time and is applicable to arbitrary order systems. Theoretical analyses and simulations verify the effectiveness of our developed predefined‐time tracking control scheme.
“…A flexible performance control (FPC) scheme [17], [18] introduces the modification signals into the predetermined performance function, thus features the capability of avoiding performance violation due to input saturation. As the method termed explicit reference governor (ERG) for tacking problem developed in [19]- [21], the performance and control input constraints are converted into limitations on upper Lyapunov function (or the limitation in an invariant set), and the balance is achieved through the application of a trade-off reference trajectory.…”
This paper addresses the balanced control between performance and saturation for a class of constrained nonlinear systems, including the branches: balanced command filtered backstepping (BCFB) and balanced performance control (BPC). To balance the interconnection and conflict between performance and saturation constraints, define a performance safety evaluation (PSE) function, which evaluates the system safety under the destabilizing effect variables (DEVs) like saturation quantity and filter errors, then the cumulative effects of DEVs are fully utilized and compensated for the performance recovery. Specifically, there exists some degree of tolerance for the DEVs in the safety region, and the compensation operation works when the evaluation of the system goes dangerous. The advantages of the proposed methodology are illustrated in the numerical simulation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.