2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preschoolers’ credulity toward misinformation from ingroup versus outgroup speakers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(71 reference statements)
4
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that White children might have viewed both the foreign-accented White speaker and the native-accented Chinese speaker as partially "outgroup". Alternatively, it is also possible that these children had an initial bias toward the same-race speakers, but the foreign accent signaled potential outgroup status and thus cancelled out the effect of shared race (McDonald & Ma, 2016). Taken together, the present findings suggest that White children, in particular, have preferences to learn from same-race informants when no cues to outgroup status are present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is possible that White children might have viewed both the foreign-accented White speaker and the native-accented Chinese speaker as partially "outgroup". Alternatively, it is also possible that these children had an initial bias toward the same-race speakers, but the foreign accent signaled potential outgroup status and thus cancelled out the effect of shared race (McDonald & Ma, 2016). Taken together, the present findings suggest that White children, in particular, have preferences to learn from same-race informants when no cues to outgroup status are present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…It is possible that certain social-cognitive mechanisms underlie both processes of selective trust. For instance, some children demonstrate selective credulity based on speaker characteristics, only acting with skepticism when provided with a false testimony from an ethnic outgroup member (McDonald & Ma, 2016). That is, they weigh their own observations or knowledge as more accurate than the information being presented to them.…”
Section: The Construct Of Selective Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike epistemic information (expertise), which is typically malleable and under the control of the teacher, social group information is typically fixed. Yet, children do monitor for and selectively prefer to learn from an individual who is a member of their social group (Corriveau, Fusaro, et al, 2009; Elashi & Mills, 2014; Kinzler et al, 2011; McDonald & Ma, 2016). For example, they prefer to learn from an informant who shares their racial group (Chen, Corriveau, & Harris, 2013), gender (Boseovski, Hughes, & Miller, 2016), or accent (Corriveau, Kinzler, & Harris, 2013) and wins group consensus (Corriveau, Fusaro, et al, 2009).…”
Section: Cues Children Use To Determine Trust In Teachersmentioning
confidence: 99%