Preparing ‘middle actors’ to deliver zero-carbon building transitions

Abstract

The urgent transition to a zero-carbon economy requires building professionals to be supportive of, and prepared for, delivering zero-carbon buildings. Building professionals are important 'middle actors' who can either enable or inhibit such societal transitions. This paper explores building professionals' perspectives on delivering zero-carbon buildings, leading to a practical synthesis of knowledge and skill requirements and training pathways. It draws on the middle-out perspective (MOP) and secondary analysis of three UK case studies. The MOP suggests that middle actors in a system are not perfectly responsive to policy push or market pull. Instead, they exert their own agency and capacity downstream to customers and clients, sideways to other middle actors and, occasionally, upstream to policy-makers. The data comprise: interviews and a small survey with building professionals on energy efficiency and refurbishment; the observation of a specific commercial office building design and development and a workshop to identify zero-carbon knowledge and skill needs of middle actors. Building professionals addressed in this paper include vocational trades, engineers, designers, project managers and 'clerks of works' (site-based quality technicians). Although formal training pathways for these roles differ, each can develop expertise 'sideways' interacting between professions. Practice relevance • Collaboration between academia, vocational training and industry could support sideways initiatives to better enable delivery of zero-carbon buildings. • Policy-makers and regulators need to create routes to capture, listen to and use the perspectives of building professionals. At present, these actors have very little upstream influence. • Middle-actor groups in construction undertake different activities, but share training routes, knowledge support systems and professional networks. • These routes, systems and networks would allow actors to facilitate change from the 'middleout' in a way complementary to top-down change driven by policy and bottom-up changes led by citizens. • Training routes can include formal, on-the-job (informal) or e-learning. Prioritising on-the-job knowledge-sharing could promote upskilling. • Roles such as a clerk of works could assist in overseeing construction processes. • Vocational professionals are the priority group of middle actors to build capacity, knowledge and influence.

Unhealthy Neighbourhood “Syndrome”: A Useful Label for Analysing and Providing Advice on Urban Design Decision-Making?

“…The urban design process is highly complicated, involving many actors, engaging with multiple contending forces, with highly intricate interactions between all these. It is this complexity which Figure 5 seeks to depict [177,178]. As a result, there is no single paramount paradigm around which to organize thought and action in this arena.…”

Barriers to domestic retrofit quality: Are failures in retrofit standards a failure of retrofit standards?

“…Similar concerns have been found previously, with building professionals being reluctant to recommend technologies that may not be cost effective. 42 The main example of suggesting insulation in our data was when to accompany a heat pump, which requires well insulated homes to operate effectively, and as the pumps are relatively expensive, the additional cost of insulation was viewed as being more proportionate. Installer confidence appears to be a success criterion for retrofit products; this may have implications for products other than IWI.…”

Seeking the Pressure Points: Catalysing Low Carbon Changes from the Middle-Out in Offices and Schools

“…An obvious limitation is the small sample size, partly occasioned by the exploratory nature of the study, and the deliberate selection of experts in two sub-sectors, making a smaller pool inevitable with the resources and time available. Although other studies in this area of research have had successful results with similar interview sample sizes [49,59,67,68], future research would benefit from investigating these initial exploratory findings amongst a wider selection of interviewees. Additionally, in some cases, respondent organisations are "pro-environmental", which may introduce a positive bias towards the adoption of low-carbon strategies and technologies.…”

“…They use Janda and Parag's ideas to suggest that tensions between micro (on the job "real work" by individuals) and macro (institutional change at a larger scale) are worthy of further investigation when considering professionals' role in environmental change. More recently, Simpson et al [59] found that middle actors-in this case, tradespeople in the building industry-do not have equal ability to influence policymakers upstream and clients downstream. Their downstream influence was greater than their upstream influence.…”