2000
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5973.00138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparing for the Future: Critical Challenges in Crisis Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
143
1
10

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
143
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Many authors deplore the fact that planning exercises are limited to establishing routines and formal plans that will rarely be put into practice (Comfort, 2005;McEntire & Myers, 2004;Perry & Lindell, 2003a) rather than situating planning within an ongoing process to improve the organization's intrinsic preparedness to cope with crises (Boin & Lagadec, 2000;Robert & Lajtah, 2003;Pearce, 2003). According to Perry and Lindell (2003a), a serious and rigorous approach to crisis planning and preparedness should be based on four major components: 1) evaluating the risks (vulnerability assessment); 2) evaluating the ability of the organization and community to cope with crises (capacity assessment); 3) developing and maintaining the skills of individual responders; and 4) establishing a flexible structure that can be deployed quickly when a crisis arises.…”
Section: A Diagnostic Methods Based On Major Trends In the Disaster LImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors deplore the fact that planning exercises are limited to establishing routines and formal plans that will rarely be put into practice (Comfort, 2005;McEntire & Myers, 2004;Perry & Lindell, 2003a) rather than situating planning within an ongoing process to improve the organization's intrinsic preparedness to cope with crises (Boin & Lagadec, 2000;Robert & Lajtah, 2003;Pearce, 2003). According to Perry and Lindell (2003a), a serious and rigorous approach to crisis planning and preparedness should be based on four major components: 1) evaluating the risks (vulnerability assessment); 2) evaluating the ability of the organization and community to cope with crises (capacity assessment); 3) developing and maintaining the skills of individual responders; and 4) establishing a flexible structure that can be deployed quickly when a crisis arises.…”
Section: A Diagnostic Methods Based On Major Trends In the Disaster LImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They deal with crisis reasons and causes, bankruptcy, crisis management, company state estimation, bankruptcy prediction and its methods. Characteristics of crisis situation were analyzed by Augustine (1995); Ayres (1996); Booth (2000); Burn, Redwood (2003); Demirguc-Kunt, Detragiache (1998); Hart (1993) ;Hwang, Lichtenthal (2000); Milburn et al (1993); Ravid, Sundgren (1998); Rogov (2006) ;Jasilionienė, Tamosiunienė (2009); problems of crisis management were discussed in the works of Ashcroft (1997); Alas (2008) ;Boin, Lagadec (2000); Darling et al (1996); ; Davidavičienė (2008); Donoho (1994); Escarraz, Chong (1998); Fink (2002); Kurosheva (Курoшева 2002); Lalonde (2004); Maynard (1993);Milesi-Ferritti, Razin (1998); Mitroff (2005); Murphy (2006); Ponikvar (2009);Paraskev (2006); Parsons (1996); Pearson, Clair (1998); Ulmer et al (2007); Valackiene Virbickaite (2009); causes of crisis and bankruptcy in a modern company were dealt with by Argenti (2005); Birch (1994); Grigaravičius (2002); Kaminsky (1998); ; Martin (1991); Preble (1997); Ren (2000); Rosenblatt, Sheaffer (2002); Rosenthal, Charl...…”
Section: Scientifi C Analysis Object Is the C Oncept Of Crisis Situatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This combination of difficult tasks and emerging challenges seems to render obsolete traditional ways of organising for crises (Boin and Lagadec, 2000). If this is the case, we ask, what answers do urban cities produce?…”
Section: Introduction: Emerging Challenges In the Crisis Arenamentioning
confidence: 99%