2017
DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2017.1321554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparing EFL student teachers with new technologies in the Korean context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study outcomes showed that learning summary writing via CAL environment appeared to be more effective, in comparison to the conventional method. In fact, the results appear to concur with those reported in prior investigations (see Chiu, 2015;Jeong, 2017;Wade-Stein & Kintsch, 2004;Wang et al, 2013), wherein CAL environment enhanced and facilitated language learning performance. (Kalyuga, Chandler, Tuovinen, & Sweller, 2001).…”
Section: Effect Of Using Sw-pal On El Of Subjects With Varied Levelsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study outcomes showed that learning summary writing via CAL environment appeared to be more effective, in comparison to the conventional method. In fact, the results appear to concur with those reported in prior investigations (see Chiu, 2015;Jeong, 2017;Wade-Stein & Kintsch, 2004;Wang et al, 2013), wherein CAL environment enhanced and facilitated language learning performance. (Kalyuga, Chandler, Tuovinen, & Sweller, 2001).…”
Section: Effect Of Using Sw-pal On El Of Subjects With Varied Levelsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Studies concerning CAL have escalated in line with technology advancement so as to enhance summary writing skills among students (Abdi et al, 2016;Chiu, 2015;He, Hui, & Quan, 2009;Idris et al, 2011;Sung et al, 2016;Wade-Stein & Kintsch, 2004). CAL instils confidence amidst teachers and students to develop both pedagogical and technological skills (Jeong, 2017;Wang et al, 2013). In fact, CAL has been proven time and again in its efficacy of promoting enhanced learning performances, especially when compared with conventional methods (Chiu, 2015;Jeong, 2017;Wade-Stein & Kintsch, 2004;Wang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koreans' attitudes towards smart devices and integration of such devices in the classroom remains positive, yet Korean classrooms fall behind in such an integration. One study by Jeong (2017) found that in Korean classrooms, technology was only widely used in elementary schools but then dropped after students enter middle school. This is not to say that Korean students do not want to integrate more forms of technology into their education.…”
Section: Korean Culture and The Classroommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, all students who partook in the research remained very literate and adept in using a variety of technological formats ranging from many functions within the smartphone and the PC. The profile of the students could be equated with Jeong's (2017) definition of a digital native as being someone "who [has] sophisticated digital literacy through abundant exposure to [several kinds of] technologies" (p. 2). All participants were informed before taking the survey and the interview that they did not have to do so if they did not wish.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to make learning experiences transferable, reliable and supportive teachers foster learner autonomy of their students and are autonomous learners themselves. Numerous research studies (Benson, 2001;Cotteral, 2000;Benson & Huang, 2008;Kyeong-Ouk, 2017;Zadorozhna, 2015 etc) demonstrate the need for developing learner autonomy of pre-serice teachers for they will, in their turn, promote its development in the learners they will work with.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%