2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.09.085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation, physicochemical properties and biocompatibility of PBLG/PLGA/bioglass composite scaffolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, PLGA compound with MNBG (to be 3D scaffold) not only complement each other but facilitated bone repair performance as well. In fact, PLGA/BG scaffolds have been prepared in previous studies (Zhou et al, 2014; Cui et al, 2017; Kim et al, 2017). However, the composite scaffold they prepared with an irregular and sharp pore structure which was not conducive to cell growth and migration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, PLGA compound with MNBG (to be 3D scaffold) not only complement each other but facilitated bone repair performance as well. In fact, PLGA/BG scaffolds have been prepared in previous studies (Zhou et al, 2014; Cui et al, 2017; Kim et al, 2017). However, the composite scaffold they prepared with an irregular and sharp pore structure which was not conducive to cell growth and migration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 The positive expression of CD34 immunohistochemical staining results is the formation of newborn capillaries, which reflects the condition of newborn capillaries formation during osteogenesis. 19 As shown in Figure 6, varies degrees of CD34 positive expression regions were seen in all implanted materials which were mainly expressed on the membrane and plasma of vascular endothelial cells. The positive expression of CD34 in group A-2, A-4, B-4, C-4, D-4 and F-4 were higher than other groups, indicating a better new capillary formation during osteogenesis in these groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This finding was consistent with other in vivo models, in which histological assessment of Bioglass 45S5 in fiber form (melt-derived system, 15 μm diameter) and a variation of Bioglass 45S5 in powder form (particle size, 40 µm to 63 µm), indicated the absence of necrosis and a lack of inflammatory infiltrate (22). Similarly, in another rat subcutaneous model, the incorporation of composites in bioactive glass (pore size range 50-500 μm) exhibited a gradual reduction in inflammatory reaction over implantation time (23). Thus, Bioglass was biocompatible in these studies, regardless of particle size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%