1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19991220)74:13<3254::aid-app28>3.0.co;2-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of nylon 66/mesoporous molecular sieve composite under high pressure

Abstract: Nylon 66/mesoporous molecular sieve (pore diameter: 2.7 nm) composites were prepared by annealing mixtures of nylon 66 and mesoporous molecular sieve (FSM) powders under high pressures and high temperature (FSM content: 0 -60 wt %; pressure: 0.5-30 MPa; temperature: 300°C; time: 1 h). X-ray diffraction and TEM measurements indicated the presence of the pores of FSM in the composite. Above 2 MPa, nylon 66 was charged in the pores of FSM. The fraction of the charged nylon 66 increased with pressure and was indep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…tetraethylorthosilicate, TEOS) [9][10][11][12] or purely inorganic reagents (e.g., sodium silicate and colloidal silica) [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. These mesostructured forms of silica show considerable promise as reinforcing agents for several engineering polymer systems at relatively low particle loadings due in part to the high surface area and favorable interfacial interactions between the polymer and the silica surface [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. The unique pore structures provide enough intraparticle space for the polymer to impregnate the particles and form a unique composite structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tetraethylorthosilicate, TEOS) [9][10][11][12] or purely inorganic reagents (e.g., sodium silicate and colloidal silica) [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. These mesostructured forms of silica show considerable promise as reinforcing agents for several engineering polymer systems at relatively low particle loadings due in part to the high surface area and favorable interfacial interactions between the polymer and the silica surface [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. The unique pore structures provide enough intraparticle space for the polymer to impregnate the particles and form a unique composite structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18] A few attempts have been made to use ordered mesoporous forms of silica for polymer reinforcement. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] For instance, two dimensional MCM-41 [19,20] silica (pore size $3 nm) and three dimensional MCM-48 silica [21,22] (pore size $3 nm) were found to function as reinforcing agents in the in-situ polymerization of polyimide, poly(3-trimethoxysilypropylmethacrylate), poly(vinyl acetate) and poly(methyl Mesostructured forms of silica (denoted MSU-J) and aminopropyl-functionalized silica (denoted AP-MSU-J) with wormhole framework structures are effective reinforcing agents for a rubbery epoxy polymer. At loadings of 2.0-10 wt %, MSU-J silica with an average framework pore size of 14 nm (65 8C assembly temperature) provides superior reinforcement properties in comparison to MSU-J silica with a smaller average framework pore size of 5.3 nm (25 8C assembly temperature), even though the surface area of the larger pore mesostructure (670 m 2 g À1 ) is substantially lower than the smaller pore mesostructure (964 m 2 g À1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, attempts to use MCM-41 and related mesoporous forms of silica as reinforcing agents by direct dispersion in a polymer matrix have been less successful. For instance, a Nylon 66 [23] composite containing 35 wt % of hexagonal FSM silica (average pore diameter <3.5 nm) exhibited only a 2-fold increase in storage modulus. Marginal improvements in the tensile properties also were observed for hexagonal MCM-41 silica filled polypropylene under supercritical CO 2 conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphological control of mesoporous silica such as FSM-16 and KSW-2 is quite difficult because the starting layered silicates cannot be morphologically controlled. On the other hand, there has been a report on the preparation of a Nylon66/FSM-16 composite as a polymer film, [189] which may be another possibility for the application of mesoporous silica derived from layered silicates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%