2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2009.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation of nanotubes-clay hybrid systems by iron-catalyzed isobutane decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The widths of the D band (40-60 cm −1 ) and the G band (28-42 cm −1 ) measured in MWCNT spectra are compatible with those reported for crystalline graphite-like allotropes, [16] which allows ruling out the presence of amorphous phases that give rise to quite broad bands (>100 cm −1 ). Different from the case in which different carbonaceous phases coexist within the same sample, [18] the G band has a single peak; moreover, except for a few of samples (A1, M3 and C1), it is detected at positions (1575-1580 cm −1 ) always lower than in the aspurchased graphite sample (1582 cm −1 ), where a smaller line width (17 cm −1 ) is further measured. Besides, as expected, [5] in MWCNT samples the G band position is down-shifted with respect to sample G1 (∼2700 cm −1 against a centre position of Table 1. ∼2720 cm −1 , respectively), thus demonstrating the absence of graphite as a by-product.…”
Section: Micro-raman Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The widths of the D band (40-60 cm −1 ) and the G band (28-42 cm −1 ) measured in MWCNT spectra are compatible with those reported for crystalline graphite-like allotropes, [16] which allows ruling out the presence of amorphous phases that give rise to quite broad bands (>100 cm −1 ). Different from the case in which different carbonaceous phases coexist within the same sample, [18] the G band has a single peak; moreover, except for a few of samples (A1, M3 and C1), it is detected at positions (1575-1580 cm −1 ) always lower than in the aspurchased graphite sample (1582 cm −1 ), where a smaller line width (17 cm −1 ) is further measured. Besides, as expected, [5] in MWCNT samples the G band position is down-shifted with respect to sample G1 (∼2700 cm −1 against a centre position of Table 1. ∼2720 cm −1 , respectively), thus demonstrating the absence of graphite as a by-product.…”
Section: Micro-raman Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1). [15,18,19] In SWCNTs, the D band shifts towards lower wavenumbers with respect to MWCNTs (1345 cm −1 in place of 1350 cm −1 , for 2.41 eV excitation). [5] In MWCNTs, the D band further appears (around 1610 cm −1 at 2.41 eV) as a weak shoulder to the G band.…”
Section: Raman Scattering In Graphite and Graphiterelated Carbonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The former, coded "A" or "K" depending on the support material (alumina or K10-montmorillonite, respectively) of the Fe-catalyst, were synthesised by isobutane CCVD by using the conditions reported in Table 1. A detailed description of catalyst preparation, synthesis experiments and subsequent sample purification can be found elsewhere, [7,20] together with an extensive discussion concerning growth mechanisms and the influence of CCVD parameters on the resulting CNT specifics. The latter, coded "C" and characterised by different nominal outer diameters (Table 2), were purchased from Bayer (C1) and Helix Material Solutions Inc. (C2-C4).…”
Section: Investigated Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%