2020
DOI: 10.1080/07370652.2020.1840666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and properties of lowest eutectic mixture MTNP/TNAZ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the functional group of the MeNQ‐NQ eutectic was essentially consistent with the raw MeNQ and NQ, an indication that the two were well combined. There were no new groups generated, implying that MeNQ and NQ did not react with each other [50, 51].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the functional group of the MeNQ‐NQ eutectic was essentially consistent with the raw MeNQ and NQ, an indication that the two were well combined. There were no new groups generated, implying that MeNQ and NQ did not react with each other [50, 51].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methyl nitroguanidine (MeNQ) [9][10][11][12][13][14], 3,4-dinitrofurazanfuroxan (DNTF) [15][16][17][18], and 1,3,3-trinitroazetidine (TNAZ) [19][20][21][22] based energetic eutectics have been reported over the past 30 years. TNAZ-DNTF eutectic has high thermal stability and energy level but due to the high sensitivity of DNTF its friction sensitivity and impact sensitivity are slightly higher than TNT and B explosives [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 shows that the main thermal decomposition products of the raw material TNBA were CO, N 4. Figure 10a shows plots of the burst temperature versus time for raw materials TNBA and DNTF and the lowest eutectic, Figure 10b shows linear regression data for plots of ln(t) versus 1000/T calculated according to Equation (10) [36,37], and Figure 10c shows the calculated activation energies and 5 s burst temperature calculated according to Equation (10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activation energy values obtained by the fitting formula in Figure 8d and Equation (10) differed. This was due to the various testing methodologies [37, 38]. Figure 11 shows the impact sensitivities and friction sensitivities of the raw materials TNBA and DNTF and the lowest eutectic.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques, such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and specific surface area testing (Brunauer-Emmett-Teller method), can only analyze the relative dispersity of the samples and cannot quantitatively analyze the dispersity of nanomaterials. [32][33][34][35][36] Therefore, a quantitative analysis method for evaluating the dispersity of nanomaterials is necessary. Our group proposed a mechanism based on the differences in solid UV absorbance between different ener-getic materials and established a difference equation to quantitatively analyze the dispersity of nanomaterials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%