2011
DOI: 10.5582/ddt.2011.v5.6.311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and evaluation of fenoterol hydrobromide suppositories

Abstract: Fenoterol HBr is a bronchodilator known to be subject to first pass effect after oral administration. The aim of this study was to prepare and evaluate fenoterol HBr suppositories. Suppositories were prepared by a fusion method using different fatty bases, viz.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are in agreement with that reported by Ghorab et al (2011) who found that the release rate of fenoterol hydrobromide from different PEG bases was dependent on their hydrophilic and lipophilic character.…”
Section: In Vitro Release From Peg Basessupporting
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results are in agreement with that reported by Ghorab et al (2011) who found that the release rate of fenoterol hydrobromide from different PEG bases was dependent on their hydrophilic and lipophilic character.…”
Section: In Vitro Release From Peg Basessupporting
confidence: 95%
“…The Erweka method was used to measure the weight in kilograms a suppository can bear without breaking (Ghorab et al, 2011).…”
Section: Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Suppositories containing 25 mg of sildenafil were prepared by a cream melting technique using Witepsol H-15 as a suppository base 21 . Primarily, an appropriate amount of Witepsol H-15 was melted in a water bath maintained at a temperature of 65 AE 2 C and was mixed with 25 mg of sildenafil powder.…”
Section: Preparation Of Svsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, when administered intravenously, some anticancer drugs, such as epirubicin, may cause damage to the vein into which it is injected [2]. The rectal route for drug administration possesses the advantage of the decreased side effects by avoiding both oral unpleasant taste and reducing GI irritation [3]. However, the conventional solid suppository has the drawbacks of patient discomfort, leading to decreased patient compliance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%