2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10337-015-2896-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and Evaluation of a Novel Solid-Phase Microextraction Fiber Based on Functionalized Nanoporous Silica Coating for Extraction of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons From Water Samples Followed by GC–MS Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fiber exhibited much higher EEs to phenols than the commercial PDMS fiber [198]. In other works, phenyl-functionalized SBA-15 was used for the extraction of PAHs [199], and mercaptopropyl-functionalized nanoporous silica was used for the extraction of phenols [200] Query ID=``Q3' ' Text=``Please check and confirm the inserted citation of Table 2.6 is correct. If not, please suggest an alternative citation.…”
Section: Conductive Polymers and Modified Silicamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This fiber exhibited much higher EEs to phenols than the commercial PDMS fiber [198]. In other works, phenyl-functionalized SBA-15 was used for the extraction of PAHs [199], and mercaptopropyl-functionalized nanoporous silica was used for the extraction of phenols [200] Query ID=``Q3' ' Text=``Please check and confirm the inserted citation of Table 2.6 is correct. If not, please suggest an alternative citation.…”
Section: Conductive Polymers and Modified Silicamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since their first application as SPME coatings in 2009 [ 40 ], MOFs have demonstrated excellent capability for the extraction of compounds belonging to different chemical classes due to their high surface area, good thermal and chemical stability, controlled pore size, and tunable surface chemistry by selecting metal ions, organic ligands, or synthetic conditions [ 25 , 29 , 31 ]. In particular, adsorption studies have demonstrated that after activation MOFs present surface areas characterized by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) values up to 7000 m 2 /g [ 29 , 31 ], higher than commonly applied SPME coatings such as activated carbon (~1500 m 2 /g), zeolites (300–600 m 2 /g), silica-based (300–800 m 2 /g) [ 41 , 42 ], or commercially available coatings, e.g., DVB (750 m 2 /g) [ 43 ]. The proper design of the MOF framework can also play a key role in enhancing selectivity by strengthening the steric complementarity between the host and the guests or by enhancing MOF–analyte interactions via hydrogen bonding, π-π, CH-π, electrostatic, van der Waals, hydrophobic/hydrophilic interactions, or via the coordination of the free metal sites present in the lattice [ 25 , 44 ].…”
Section: Metal–organic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the low concentration levels of the PAHs in water and soil samples and the complexity of sample matrices, it is essential to use appropriate sample pretreatment techniques to enrich them to satisfy the instrumental detection requirements. In recent years, many sample preparation technologies have been introduced to extract PAHs from different sample matrices [10–19]. They include solid‐phase extraction (SPE) [11, 12], liquid‐phase microextraction (LPME) [13], dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) [14], stir bar sorptive extraction [15], magnetic solid‐phase extraction (MSPE) [16], and solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) [17–19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%