2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and emulsifying properties of trace elements fortified gum arabic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Figure 4, the zeta potential of all emulsions was negative, and the zeta potential value was quite high. Previous studies have reported that both PGA and GA contain negative charges [37,41,42]. The emulsion prepared by DOP alone exhibited the smallest amount of surface charge, while the amount of charge of the emulsion prepared by compounding polysaccharides depended upon the ratio of PGA or GA. For PGA:DOP = 8:2, the emulsion displayed the largest zeta potential value, but for GA:DOP = 8:2, the zeta potential value of the emulsion was second only to that of the emulsion prepared by GA alone.…”
Section: Zeta Potentialmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Figure 4, the zeta potential of all emulsions was negative, and the zeta potential value was quite high. Previous studies have reported that both PGA and GA contain negative charges [37,41,42]. The emulsion prepared by DOP alone exhibited the smallest amount of surface charge, while the amount of charge of the emulsion prepared by compounding polysaccharides depended upon the ratio of PGA or GA. For PGA:DOP = 8:2, the emulsion displayed the largest zeta potential value, but for GA:DOP = 8:2, the zeta potential value of the emulsion was second only to that of the emulsion prepared by GA alone.…”
Section: Zeta Potentialmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As described in Section 3.2, PGA displayed the weakest ability to reduce interfacial tension, and it was not effectively adsorbed on the droplet surface [46]. In contrast, the average particle size of the emulsion prepared by GA alone was smaller than the PGA due to the excellent adsorption rate of GA [37]. However, the particle size of the emulsion prepared by DOP alone was the smallest of the three polysaccharides, which might benefit from the high viscosity of DOP, the limited movement of the droplets, and re-agglomeration [2].…”
Section: The Particle Size Distribution Of the Emulsionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It was observed that the contact angle increases as the amount of gum Arabic in the nanoparticles increases. This behavior could be attributed to the amphiphilic moieties present in the structure of gum Arabic, namely arabinogalactan-protein fraction (AGP), which contains both hydrophobic polypeptide chains and hydrophilic polysaccharide blocks which provide it with excellent interfacial properties (Hu et al, 2019;McClements & Gumus, 2016). On the other hand, chitosan is known to have weak surface activity due to the absence of hydrophobic moieties in its structure (Elsabee et al, 2009).…”
Section: Wettability Of Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Fractions are mainly composed of arabinogalactan (90% of total mass), arabinogalactan protein (10% of total mass) and glycoprotein (1% of total mass). 31,32 GA is commonly used as an emulsier to stabilize emulsions, the emulsifying property of which is provided by an excellent interfacial property of arabinogalactan protein. The structure of arabinogalactan protein provides both hydrophobic polypeptide chain and hydrophilic carbohydrate blocks, which confers good emulsication characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%