2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12221-020-9993-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and Characterization of Poly(lactic acid) Micro- and Nanofibers Fabricated by Centrifugal Spinning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CS PLA fibers, produced at concentrations of 10, 13, and 16 wt %, exhibit mostly bead-free morphology (see Supporting Figure S3 for representative SEMs of CS PLAs at PLA concentrations and RPM used), with the exception of 3000 rpm at 10 wt % leading to the formation of minimal beads and fibers (see Table ). Consistent with existing literature, ,,,, the morphology of nanofibers was influenced by the concentration of the polymer solution and rotational speed of the spinneret. Increasing the rotational speed at a given PLA concentration generally resulted in smaller fiber diameter, presumably due to the higher centrifugal forces (see Figure a); previous PLA ES and CS studies observed an augmentation of the degree of crystallinity due to the higher extensional force. The fiber diameter distribution in CS PLA ranges from 40% (all of 10 wt % CS PLA samples) to 100% (all of 16 wt % CS PLA samples) of the mean fiber diameter, which is wider than typical ES fibers with a standard deviation of 10–20% .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…CS PLA fibers, produced at concentrations of 10, 13, and 16 wt %, exhibit mostly bead-free morphology (see Supporting Figure S3 for representative SEMs of CS PLAs at PLA concentrations and RPM used), with the exception of 3000 rpm at 10 wt % leading to the formation of minimal beads and fibers (see Table ). Consistent with existing literature, ,,,, the morphology of nanofibers was influenced by the concentration of the polymer solution and rotational speed of the spinneret. Increasing the rotational speed at a given PLA concentration generally resulted in smaller fiber diameter, presumably due to the higher centrifugal forces (see Figure a); previous PLA ES and CS studies observed an augmentation of the degree of crystallinity due to the higher extensional force. The fiber diameter distribution in CS PLA ranges from 40% (all of 10 wt % CS PLA samples) to 100% (all of 16 wt % CS PLA samples) of the mean fiber diameter, which is wider than typical ES fibers with a standard deviation of 10–20% .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Increasing the rotational speed at a given PLA concentration generally resulted in smaller fiber diameter, presumably due to the higher centrifugal forces (see Figure a); previous PLA ES and CS studies observed an augmentation of the degree of crystallinity due to the higher extensional force. The fiber diameter distribution in CS PLA ranges from 40% (all of 10 wt % CS PLA samples) to 100% (all of 16 wt % CS PLA samples) of the mean fiber diameter, which is wider than typical ES fibers with a standard deviation of 10–20% . The wider distribution of CS diameters within a sample is also in line with previous literature studies. ,,,, As displayed in Figure a,b, the diameter distribution gets wider as PLA concentration increases; this trend is attributable to increased solution viscosity resisting extensional strain from the rotational force.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Forcespinning™ (FS) or the centrifugal spinning method has emerged as a novel strategy for the fabrication of nanofibers, and this method uses centrifugal force to form ultrafine nanofibers (from 25 nm to several µm) [35]. Unlike E-spinning, the FS method consists of ejecting a polymer solution through thin needles which rotate at high-speed conditions, thus the centrifugal force produces solidification, and the stretching of the polymer and the evaporation of the solvent, allowing for the collection of the nanofibers on the walls of a cylindrical collector [36,37]. Since it uses centrifugal forces instead of electric fields, the FS method provides a higher productivity rate, over 1 mL/min per nozzle, around 200 times higher than E-spinning [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%