2005
DOI: 10.1142/s0218625x05007359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PREPARATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF In2O3 THIN FILMS FOR OPTOELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS

Abstract: Conductive transparent In 2 O 3 thin films with (222)-preferred orientation were prepared by rapid thermal oxidation (RTO) in static air of indium thin films at condition 200 • C/30 s. Detailed structural, electrical, and optical characteristics of the film are presented. The data are interpreted to give a direct bandgap of 3.6 eV and indirect bandgap of 2.5 eV. The grown In 2 O 3 films exhibited high figure of merit and sheet resistance as low as 20 Ω/sq. in the absence of any post-deposition annealing condit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen ( Figure 7(a) ), the energy gap values of the nonmagnetic field synthesized NPs with a LASER fluence of 30 mJ/cm 2 and 60 mJ/cm 2 were 3.8 and 3.3 eV, respectively, while those of the magnetic field presence synthesized NPs were at 3 eV and 3.5 eV, respectively ( Figure 7(b) ). This difference can be attributed to the differences in the particle sizes [ 46 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen ( Figure 7(a) ), the energy gap values of the nonmagnetic field synthesized NPs with a LASER fluence of 30 mJ/cm 2 and 60 mJ/cm 2 were 3.8 and 3.3 eV, respectively, while those of the magnetic field presence synthesized NPs were at 3 eV and 3.5 eV, respectively ( Figure 7(b) ). This difference can be attributed to the differences in the particle sizes [ 46 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optical energy gap of TiO 2 nanoparticles was determined by plottingof (αhν) 2 versus photon energy for direct transition as shown in Fig. 7-b and the extrapolation of the linear partto the(αhν) 2 =0 point gives the direct optical energy gap [26,27]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optical energy gap of TiO 2 nanoparticles was determined by plottingof (αhν) 2 versus photon energy for direct transition as shown in Fig.7-b and the extrapolation of the linear partto the(αhν) 2 =0 point gives the direct optical energy gap [26,27]. Fig.6-b reveals the energy gap of TiO 2 nanoparticles prepared with and without magnetic eld were 3.4 and 4.6 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%