2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and characterization of Cu2FeGeS4 thin-film synthesized via spray ultrasonic method − DFT study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such I 2 –II–IV–VI 4 compounds are quite compositionally versatile, where kesterite forms for A + = Cu + , Ag + ; B 2+ = Zn 2+ , Cd 2+ , Hg 2+ ; C 4+ = Si 4+ , Ge 4+ , Sn 4+ ; and E 2– = S 2– , Se 2– , Te 2– . Stannites are known to form for A + = Cu + ; B 2+ = Mn 2+ , Fe 2+ , Co 2+ , Ni 2+ ; C 4+ = Si 4+ , Ge 4+ , Sn 4+ ; and E 2– = S 2– , Se 2– . The tremendous compositional diversity of these materials makes them apt for research and development of tunable optoelectronic and magnetic devices . Indeed, Cu 2 FeSnS 4 dye-sensitized solar cells have achieved 8.0% power conversion efficiency, and thin film solar cells of Cu 2 ZnSn­(S x Se 1– x ) 4 have reached 12.6% power conversion efficiency .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such I 2 –II–IV–VI 4 compounds are quite compositionally versatile, where kesterite forms for A + = Cu + , Ag + ; B 2+ = Zn 2+ , Cd 2+ , Hg 2+ ; C 4+ = Si 4+ , Ge 4+ , Sn 4+ ; and E 2– = S 2– , Se 2– , Te 2– . Stannites are known to form for A + = Cu + ; B 2+ = Mn 2+ , Fe 2+ , Co 2+ , Ni 2+ ; C 4+ = Si 4+ , Ge 4+ , Sn 4+ ; and E 2– = S 2– , Se 2– . The tremendous compositional diversity of these materials makes them apt for research and development of tunable optoelectronic and magnetic devices . Indeed, Cu 2 FeSnS 4 dye-sensitized solar cells have achieved 8.0% power conversion efficiency, and thin film solar cells of Cu 2 ZnSn­(S x Se 1– x ) 4 have reached 12.6% power conversion efficiency .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2d). We compared the E g value with those of typical Fe-containing materials 31,32,[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63] according to a detailed literature survey, as shown in Fig. 2e, and found that Sr 2 FeGe 2 OS 6 displays the largest E g among the 16 reported compounds based on experimental measurements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Band structure calculations indicate that Cu 2 MnSiS 4 is a semiconductor with a direct band gap ( E g direct = 1.73 eV) located at Γ, while Cu 2 FeSiS 4 has an indirect band gap ( E g indirect = 1.52 eV) formed from N (VBM) to Y (CBM) (Figure ). The calculated band gaps are in a reasonable range compared to those calculated for the previously reported CTMS and related compounds: Ag 2 FeSiS 4 ( E g direct = 1.99 eV), Cu 2 MnGeS 4 ( E g direct = 1.72 eV), Cu 2 FeGeS 4 ( E g direct = 1.8 eV), Cu 2 CoGeS 4 ( E g direct = 0.81 eV), Cu 2 NiGeS 4 ( E g direct = 1.76, 1.78 eV), Cu 2 MnSnS 4 ( E g direct = 1.4, 1.52 eV), , Cu 2 FeSnS 4 ( E g direct = 1.7 eV), Cu 2 CoSnS 4 ( E g direct = 1.2 eV), and Cu 2 NiSnS 4 ( E g direct = 1.29 eV) . The indirect band gap is already reported in Ag 2 MnSnS 4 ( E g indirect = 2.00 eV) and Li 2 FeSnS 4 ( E g indirect = 1.42 eV) based on optical measurements. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%