2014
DOI: 10.1080/03602559.2014.886044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preparation and Adsorption Research of the Modification Macroporous Adsorption Resin (LX1180)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on our previous research (Liu et al , 2011; Chen et al , 2011; Long et al , 2014), this work focused on the separation and purification of flavonoids from Sophora japonica by MAR mixed-bed technology. First, the MAR mixed bed was screened based on the single, two, three and four MAR mixed-bed adsorption experiment, and the optimal combination of the MAR mixed bed was obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our previous research (Liu et al , 2011; Chen et al , 2011; Long et al , 2014), this work focused on the separation and purification of flavonoids from Sophora japonica by MAR mixed-bed technology. First, the MAR mixed bed was screened based on the single, two, three and four MAR mixed-bed adsorption experiment, and the optimal combination of the MAR mixed bed was obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our labs have focused on improving the adsorption performance of MAR for 10 years, and a novel method of the MAR mixed-bed technology had been exploited. Based on previous results (Chen et al , 2011; Long et al , 2014), first, a MAR mixed bed for flavonoids from Lamiophlomis rotata (Benth.) Kudo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A showed the equilibrium adsorption capacity ( Q e ) increased with the initial concentration ( C 0 ) till it approached a maximum at C 0 = 3.5 g/L, which indicated MIP had a very high affinity to GA, and meant selectivity of the MIP toward GA was high, which could be attributed to the high porosity, plenty of cavities and especially large amount of free efficient sites, because the adsorption of free efficient sites was intermolecular forces, and the form of hydrogen bond can remarkably enhanced Q e . After fitting the adsorption isotherm results with Langmuir (6b), Freundlich (6c) and Scatchard (6d) models . respectively, we could found the Freundlich model was more suitable to express the adsorption behavior of GA‐MIP, which meant the adsorption of MIP to GA was a physically multi‐layer adsorption and could be understand easily, because the original self‐assembly driving force between GA and functional monomers in the process was a physical interaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the interaction difference of CIC, DIC and IAC to model molecules, the selectivity or affinity would show a difference correspondingly. Figure 7A showed the influence of n GA /n NMBA on Q GA , Q GL and D. It could be concluded that with the decrease of n GA /n NMBA, Q GA , Q GL and D increased firstly, then tends to decrease gradually, which reached a maximum at the ratio of n GA /n NMBA = 1:38, the variation of porosity in polymer network was the main reason [19,20]. Because NMBA was the crosslinker and the quantities which influenced the solubility and rigidity of MIP, the porosity of MIP varied with n GA /n NMBA correspondingly.…”
Section: The Adsorption Isothermmentioning
confidence: 94%