1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)90212-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative Parenteral Feeding in Patients With Gastrointestinal Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
9

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 437 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
66
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Those studies that did indicate benefits from PN tended to include heterogeneous populations 43,45 that consisted of both malnourished and well nourished patients. Unfortu nately, some studies reporting benefits also had faulty study designs.…”
Section: Practice Guidelines and Rationalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those studies that did indicate benefits from PN tended to include heterogeneous populations 43,45 that consisted of both malnourished and well nourished patients. Unfortu nately, some studies reporting benefits also had faulty study designs.…”
Section: Practice Guidelines and Rationalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the published information relating to the supposed beneficial effects of TPN as an adjunct to surgery or chemotherapy for malignant disease have concentrated on the immediate peritherapeutic period with no regard for the long-term outcome (Copeland et al 1977;Heatley et al 1979;Muller et al 1982). More recently, several clinical studies have suggested that in fact the prognosis may be worse in parenterally-fed patients for reasons unrelated simply to the presence of a central venous feeding catheter.…”
Section: Effects Of Lipid Emulsions On Lymphocyte Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two previously published analyses have suggested that PNS would save money, 44 at least under certain circumstances. 49 One study 44 employed ef®cacy data from only the most favourable trial 50 to draw their conclusions. The other study used hypothetical ef®ca-cies, and noted that the calculations were very sensitive to the assumptions being made regarding ef®cacy.…”
Section: ±19mentioning
confidence: 99%