Preoperative intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost in locally advanced rectal cancer: Report on late toxicity and outcome
“…The method we used thus seems feasible for creating core lists for other treatments and other cancer types. As can be seen from a number of recent publications, the interest in the sequelae of rectal cancer treatment, and other cancer treatments as well, is rising [21,22]. Our study is thus timely in showing a feasible method to determine which such sequelae should be communicated with patients during the consultation.…”
This study showed substantial overlap between benefits/harms that patients and oncologists consider important to address during the consultation, and at the same time poor congruence with daily clinical practice.
“…The method we used thus seems feasible for creating core lists for other treatments and other cancer types. As can be seen from a number of recent publications, the interest in the sequelae of rectal cancer treatment, and other cancer treatments as well, is rising [21,22]. Our study is thus timely in showing a feasible method to determine which such sequelae should be communicated with patients during the consultation.…”
This study showed substantial overlap between benefits/harms that patients and oncologists consider important to address during the consultation, and at the same time poor congruence with daily clinical practice.
“…A recently published prospective Belgium study (21,27) patients evaluated for late toxicity, only one reported grade 3 non-haematological toxicity, likely related to the oxaliplatin rather than the radiotherapy. Grade 2 late non-hematologic toxicity was somewhat higher at 31%.…”
Section: Late Toxicity After Imrt / Vmatmentioning
Purpose of review:This review summarizes the available evidence for the use of modern radiotherapy techniques for chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer, with specific focus on intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) techniques.
Recent findings:The dosimetric benefits of IMRT and VMAT are well-established, but prospective clinical studies are limited, with phase I-II studies only. Recent years have seen the publication of a few larger prospective patient series as well as some retrospective cohorts, several of which include much needed late toxicity data. Overall results are encouraging, as toxicity levels although varying across reports appear lower than for 3D conformal radiotherapy. Innovative treatment techniques and strategies which may be facilitated by the use of IMRT/VMAT include simultaneously integrated tumour boost, adaptive treatment, selective sparing of specific organs to enable chemotherapy escalation, and non-surgical management.
Summary:Few prospective studies of IMRT and VMAT exist, which causes uncertainty not just in regards to the clinical benefit of these technologies but also in the optimal use. The priority for future research should be subgroups of patients who might receive relatively greater benefit from innovative treatment techniques, such as patients receiving CRT with definitive intent and patients treated with dose escalation.
“…This may many consider natural, as further development in oncology lies in new drugs and particularly in those with a specific target on the tumor cells or the tumor micro-environment. However, the radiotherapy has developed considerably during the past decades, and the radiation dose can today be better conformed to the tumor cell containing volumes with possibilities for increased doses without increased normal tissue complications than in the past [20,21]. The study by Hall et al in this issue of Acta Oncologica [22] is then of great interest.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.