2016
DOI: 10.7326/m16-0652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative Frailty Assessment and Outcomes at 6 Months or Later in Older Adults Undergoing Cardiac Surgical Procedures

Abstract: Background Frailty assessment may inform surgical risk and prognosis that are not captured by conventional surgical risk scores. Purpose To evaluate the evidence for various frailty instruments to predict mortality, functional status, or major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in older adults undergoing cardiac surgical procedures. Data Sources MEDLINE and EMBASE (without language restrictions), from their inception to May 2, 2016. Study Selection Cohort studies that evaluated the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
133
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(132 reference statements)
2
133
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the wide range of published prevalence and frailty‐related mortality risk is likely because of the differences in frailty instruments used. A systematic review of 8 studies directly comparing 9 different frailty instruments used in cardiac surgery cohorts noted that the multicomponent instruments provided better mortality risk prediction, despite poorer discrimination than their abbreviated single‐domain counterparts 3. The Johns Hopkins ACG frailty indicator is a comprehensive tool that provides a multidimensional snapshot of a patient's physical status and is able to predict the risk of long‐term mortality in this cohort of patients undergoing CABG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the wide range of published prevalence and frailty‐related mortality risk is likely because of the differences in frailty instruments used. A systematic review of 8 studies directly comparing 9 different frailty instruments used in cardiac surgery cohorts noted that the multicomponent instruments provided better mortality risk prediction, despite poorer discrimination than their abbreviated single‐domain counterparts 3. The Johns Hopkins ACG frailty indicator is a comprehensive tool that provides a multidimensional snapshot of a patient's physical status and is able to predict the risk of long‐term mortality in this cohort of patients undergoing CABG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frailty is an emerging concept in perioperative medicine but remains a poorly recognized and poorly investigated syndrome in patients undergoing cardiac surgery 1, 2, 3, 4. It is increasing in prevalence and presents a formidable challenge for clinicians who work to optimize these patients 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of 25 studies on frailty assessment for prognosis after cardiac surgery, only 2 used the Clinical Frailty Scale, and none used the scale to predict readmission. 13 The handful of prior studies conducted in a surgical setting largely reported adverse prognosis for patients with frailty, but were mostly restricted to specific procedures and short follow-up periods. [23][24][25][26][27] Very few studies have assessed a dose-response relation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, residual confounding may account for some of the risk observed; however, we adjusted for a variety of clinical and biologic markers, as did multiple prior studies of mortality. 13,24,25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation