2018
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative Changes in Hematological Markers and Predictors of Glioma Grade and Survival

Abstract: Background: Preoperative hematological markers that indicate nutritional, coagulation, and inflammation statuses have prognostic value for gliomas. This study aimed to investigate hematological markers with regard to tumor grades, isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations (IDH), age, and sex in patients with gliomas.Methods: From 2008 to 2017, patients with a pathological diagnosis of glioma who underwent surgery were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Information from clinical records, including age, sex, preop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
76
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
7
76
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the analysis of the NLR for predicting the prognosis of gliomas, 15 studies ( n = 2,798 patients) were included. The patients with a higher pre‐operative NLR had a worse prognosis (HR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.09–1.74; P = 0.008; Figure a ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the analysis of the NLR for predicting the prognosis of gliomas, 15 studies ( n = 2,798 patients) were included. The patients with a higher pre‐operative NLR had a worse prognosis (HR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.09–1.74; P = 0.008; Figure a ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients with a higher pre‐operative NLR had a worse prognosis (HR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.09–1.74; P = 0.008; Figure a ). Moreover, seven studies with 1,575 patients evaluated the PLR for predicting the prognosis of gliomas. There was no significant difference in the prognostic significance of PLR between the patients with low PLR and those with high PLR (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.75–1.29; P = 0.91; Figure b ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations