2002
DOI: 10.1067/mva.2002.128941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of diameter-reflux relationship of calf perforating veins in patients with primary varicose vein

Abstract: Although the diameter of incompetent PVs was larger than that of competent PVs in both US and intraoperative findings, diameter measurement alone can not completely distinguish competent and incompetent PVs. The sensitivity and specificity of reflux obtained with US showed that the accuracy of preoperative duplex scanning to evaluate PV competency was not sufficient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar limitations were found by Yamamoto et al,17 who compared ultrasound evaluation of the lower limb veins with intraoperative evaluation and found a poor result for ultrasound in offering a reliable comparison with data from intraoperative evaluation of veins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Similar limitations were found by Yamamoto et al,17 who compared ultrasound evaluation of the lower limb veins with intraoperative evaluation and found a poor result for ultrasound in offering a reliable comparison with data from intraoperative evaluation of veins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Moreover, Labropoulos et al [7] 5 indicated that diameters larger than 3.9 mm on US were reliably predictive of reflux in patients with skin change and ulcers. Yamamoto et al [8] 5…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Reflux was defined as flow in the reverse direction of the physiologic flow of duration Ͼ0.5 seconds after a provocation maneuver. 8 All VV patients had retrograde flow in the saphenofemoral junction; the control patients had no reflux in the GSV. We analyzed the GSV tissue that was in close to the saphenofemoral junction, excluding the terminal valve.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%