1998
DOI: 10.1086/302120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prenatal Diagnosis and Carrier Detection for a Point Mutation in UBE3A Causing Angelman Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The type and frequency of mutations we detected are in agreement with the results reported by other groups (Fang et al 1999;Fung et al 1998;Kishino et al 1997;Malzac et al 1998;Matsuura et al 1997;Moncla et al 1999a;Tsai et al 1998). The type and frequency of mutations we detected are in agreement with the results reported by other groups (Fang et al 1999;Fung et al 1998;Kishino et al 1997;Malzac et al 1998;Matsuura et al 1997;Moncla et al 1999a;Tsai et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The type and frequency of mutations we detected are in agreement with the results reported by other groups (Fang et al 1999;Fung et al 1998;Kishino et al 1997;Malzac et al 1998;Matsuura et al 1997;Moncla et al 1999a;Tsai et al 1998). The type and frequency of mutations we detected are in agreement with the results reported by other groups (Fang et al 1999;Fung et al 1998;Kishino et al 1997;Malzac et al 1998;Matsuura et al 1997;Moncla et al 1999a;Tsai et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As the only inherited multiple nucleotide deletion (case NS 27) originated post-zygotically in the mother, a mosaic carrier, this case should be excluded from the analysis, resulting in a significant association between inheritance and type of mutation (P ¼ 0.02; Fisher's exact test). In order to test this hypothesis, we reviewed all the mutations published in the literature taking into account their inheritance status and excluding mosaicism [Kishino et al, 1997;Matsuura et al, 1997;Fung et al, 1998;Malzac et al, 1998;Tsai et al, 1998;Baumer et al, 1999;Fang et al, 1999;Russo et al, 1999Russo et al, , 2000Hitchins et al, 2004;Rapakko et al, 2004;Hosoki et al, 2005;Bonaglia et al, 2007]. We found that the proportion of multiple nucleotide deletions and insertions occurring de novo (28/46 ¼ 0.61) almost doubled that of the single nucleotide substitutions (7/22 ¼ 0.32), and this difference was significant (P ¼ 0.015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…2. Distribution of missense/nonsense, in-frame and frameshift mutations in exons 8-16 of UBE3A gene described in the literature [Kishino et al, 1997;Matsuura et al, 1997;Fung et al, 1998;Malzac et al, 1998;Tsai et al, 1998;Baumer et al, 1999;Fang et al, 1999;Russo et al, 1999Russo et al, , 2000Hitchins et al, 2004;Rapakko et al, 2004;Hosoki et al, 2005;Bonaglia et al, 2007;present work].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequencies ranging from 5-6 % (Malzac et al,1998;Fang et al, 1999) to 20-30% (Tsai et al,1998) are indicated by current data on normally methylated patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A wide genetic heterogeneity underlies the clinical phenotype (Stalker et al,1998) as: a) ∼ 70% of the patients have typical large "de novo" deletions on maternal chromosome 15q11-q13, giving a risk of recurrence (RR) < 1%, b) 1-2% have rarer structural chromosome anomalies with a variable recurrence, c) ∼ 5% have paternal UPD for chromosome 15 with a RR< 1%, d) 2-9% carry Imprinting Centre (IC) mutations (RR: 50% for female carriers) (Stalker et al1998 ;Tsai et al,1998) and e) 5-6 % have UBE3A gene (MIM# 601623) mutations (RR: 50% for female carriers) (Malzac et al,1998;Fang et al, 1999). The methylation pattern is diagnostic for the first four classes of patients who show only the paternal unmethylated allele, while the remaining class has biparental methylation patterns (Glenn et al,1993) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%