2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1050-4_105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PREMΛP: Knowledge Driven Design of Materials and Engineering Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, in a development processes, data is generated throughout the organization's systems in such as the Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) system in product development (Stark, 2016) or the development of maintenance operations in a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). But transforming such raw data into something useful for decision making is a big task (Bhat et al, 2013;Chilamkurti et al, 2014;Coussement & Benoit, 2021;Ghasemaghaei & Turel, 2022;Hodkiewicz & Ho, 2016;Janssen et al, 2017;Stark, 2016), making it a generally underutilized resource (Hodkiewicz & Ho, 2016). Streams in data science tend to focus on pre-processing methods rather than how to bring the data to the decision makers (Coussement & Benoit, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, in a development processes, data is generated throughout the organization's systems in such as the Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) system in product development (Stark, 2016) or the development of maintenance operations in a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS). But transforming such raw data into something useful for decision making is a big task (Bhat et al, 2013;Chilamkurti et al, 2014;Coussement & Benoit, 2021;Ghasemaghaei & Turel, 2022;Hodkiewicz & Ho, 2016;Janssen et al, 2017;Stark, 2016), making it a generally underutilized resource (Hodkiewicz & Ho, 2016). Streams in data science tend to focus on pre-processing methods rather than how to bring the data to the decision makers (Coussement & Benoit, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most ontologies focus on specific sub-domains of the materials field (e.g., metals, ceramics, thermal properties, nanotechnology) and have been developed with a specific use in mind (e.g., search, data integration, discovery). Some examples of ontologies are the Materials Ontology (Ashino 2010) for data exchange among thermal property databases, PREMΛP ontology (Bhat et al 2013) for steel mill products, MatOnto ontology (Cheung et al 2008) for oxygen ion conducting materials in the fuel cell domain, and the FreeClassOWL ontology (Radinger et al 2013) for the construction and building materials domain. An ontology design pattern regarding material transformations was proposed in (Vardeman II et al 2017).…”
Section: Ontologies In Materials Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new set of product representation was developed that is aimed to promote knowledge reuse in design [32]. With respect to material selection in design, PreMAP, a material-driven knowledge database, allows for simulation of sets of unobserved design variables based on existing analyses [33]. This has significant implications to the detailed design stage for optimizing design features based on existing product knowledge.…”
Section: State Of the Art Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%