2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1385-1101(03)00019-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary optical classification of lakes and coastal waters in Estonia and south Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the first methods, based on K d , was created by Jerlov (1976), which proposed a scale from 1 to 9 types for coastal waters. As this method was created mainly to analyze oceanic waters, normally poor in organic matter; it is not uncommon that coastal basins display attenuation values exceeding up to eight times those of the most turbid Jerlov's class, type 9 (Reinart et al, 2003). Morel and Prieur (1977) elaborated an optical classification based on the reflectance spectra R(λ), separating the so-called case 1 and case 2 waters.…”
Section: Optical Properties and Classificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One of the first methods, based on K d , was created by Jerlov (1976), which proposed a scale from 1 to 9 types for coastal waters. As this method was created mainly to analyze oceanic waters, normally poor in organic matter; it is not uncommon that coastal basins display attenuation values exceeding up to eight times those of the most turbid Jerlov's class, type 9 (Reinart et al, 2003). Morel and Prieur (1977) elaborated an optical classification based on the reflectance spectra R(λ), separating the so-called case 1 and case 2 waters.…”
Section: Optical Properties and Classificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another optical classification applicable mainly to inland waters was proposed by Kirk (1980), distinguishing waters on their prevalent absorption components. With the aim to focus on case 2 waters and to consider the high diversity existing among them, an alternative classification was proposed by Reinart et al (2003), planned for lakes, but suitable for all coastal waters in small and shallow bays, influenced by river contributions and affected by sediments suspension, i.e. all kind of basins comparable to lakes.…”
Section: Optical Properties and Classificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Summer chlorophyll-a concentrations in the surface layer were 4.8 ±1.3 µg dm -3 , turbidity was 6.5 ±1.8 NTU, and the true colour of the water was 4.8 ±1.5 mg Pt dm -3 . Very little colouring of water (ultraoligohumic lakes) makes the optical properties of these lake waters primarily determined by phytoplankton, as evidenced from the product K d •z SD in the range of 1.9-2.7 (Koenings and Edmundson 1991;Reinart et al 2003;Borowiak 2011). In the case of Lake Szurpiły, for which this parameter is 1.5, a greater impact on the distribution of underwater light field is exerted by nonphytoplankton particles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various components, such as Chl a concentration, reflectances and Secchi depths can be used as clustering properties (e.g. Reinart et al 2003). Clustering based on reflectance spectra, combined with salinity or temperature, has led to good classification results in various oceanic areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%