1981
DOI: 10.3133/ofr81299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminary geologic interpretation of a seismic reflection profile across the Queen Charlotte Island fault system, Dixon Entrance, Canada-United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we interpret that much of the lowermost package was deposited between 13 and 6 Ma, with deformation and growth strata initiating sometime after 6 Ma. This interpretation is consistent with that of Snavely et al (1981), stating that the SEAK1 unconformity represents the Miocene-Pliocene unconformity (∼5:3 Ma).…”
Section: Crustal Flexuresupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, we interpret that much of the lowermost package was deposited between 13 and 6 Ma, with deformation and growth strata initiating sometime after 6 Ma. This interpretation is consistent with that of Snavely et al (1981), stating that the SEAK1 unconformity represents the Miocene-Pliocene unconformity (∼5:3 Ma).…”
Section: Crustal Flexuresupporting
confidence: 76%
“…6, inset), suggesting that extensional deformation is no longer active today. Without deep cores in the area, it is impossible to date mapped surfaces and faults, though other studies have interpreted the SEAK1 horizon as a Miocene-Pliocene unconformity, identifiable by truncating reflectors and a change in interval velocity (Snavely et al, 1981;Scheidhauer, 1997;Tréhu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Faultingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deformation must be younger than about 15 Ma, the age of the underlying oceanic crust. The Miocene-Pliocene unconformity (5.3 Ma), labeled U in Figures 8 and 9, can be tentatively identified west of the terrace based on an abrupt change in seismic interval velocity and the presence of truncated or bright reflectors (Snavely et al, 1981;Scheidhauer, 1997;Walton et al, 2015). This unconformity is regionally observed and may be associated with a period of erosion or nondeposition coinciding with the onset of transpression at 5-6 Ma.…”
Section: Constraints On Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the very strong seafloor multiples resulting from a reflection coefficient of ∼0:5 along most of the profiles (Scheidhauer, 1997), the first multiple and underlying data were muted prior to migration. The R/V Lee data (see Data and Resources) were 24-fold with a common midpoint spacing of 50 m, and total source volume was 22 L (1326 in 3 ) (Snavely et al, 1981;Rohr et al, 1992). The R/V Lee data were migrated using a frequencywavenumber algorithm and a velocity of 1500 m=s for this publication.…”
Section: Multichannel Seismic Reflection Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation