Preliminary design of a robotic system for kinaesthetic training of surgical tasks

Hong, Kaiwen; Sun, Yung Nien; He, Jiale; Lei, Yong; Yang, Limin

doi:10.1049/joe.2018.9405

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 16 publications

(17 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, two studies (Couto et al, 2017 ; Sampsel et al, 2014 ) employ humanoid robotic mobile platforms (with displacement capability), and in (Hong et al, 2019 ) the robot simulates a hands-on process, in which the pre-recorded movements of an experienced surgeon are transferred to the trainee.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As such, eleven studies lay in the province of physiotherapy and are oriented to physical therapy related students or practitioners, nine studies are focused on nursery skills development and two relate to dentists and dental assistants. Other specialties include gastroenterologists (Formosa et al, 2018 ), neurologists (Chihara et al, 2013 ), and surgeons (Hong et al, 2019 ). However, while in most cases the health sciences field and related specialty is described by the authors or can be easily inferred, few studies (e.g.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In (Hong et al, 2019 ) a hand-over-hand educational approach is proposed as an enhancement to passive haptic feedback simulators commonly employed in surgery education. Haptic feedback is given to the trainees based on the recordings of movements made by a specialized surgeon during surgery tasks.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Voice pain indicator Physical therapists / physiotherapy Diagnosis: manual diagnosis different knee joint symptoms Application centric Procedure: examination of a knee joint Justificative –(n = 24) nonmedical (n = 12) orthopedic Questionnaire to compare haptic feelings with real human leg vs robotic leg. Nonmedical answers used as control group Not detailed Yes—questionnaire (Hong et al, 2019 ) Robot manipulator for kinesthetic learning in surgical procedure Surgeons / Surgery Treatment: surgical procedures Application centric Basic task: Surgical tasks Justificative – control vs experimental group of novices (n = not specified) Trainer records a trajectory. Control group conducted the task without guidance while the experimental group carried out the task with guidance ‘hand-over-hand’ learning.…”

Section: Appendixmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

More than surgical tools: a systematic review of robots as didactic tools for the education of professionals in health sciences

Marcos-Pablos

García‐Peñalvo

2022

Adv in Health Sci Educ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Within the field of robots in medical education, most of the work done during the last years has focused on surgeon training in robotic surgery, practicing surgery procedures through simulators. Apart from surgical education, robots have also been widely employed in assistive and rehabilitation procedures, where education has traditionally focused in the patient. Therefore, there has been extensive review bibliography in the field of medical robotics focused on surgical and rehabilitation and assistive robots, but there is a lack of survey papers that explore the potential of robotics in the education of healthcare students and professionals beyond their training in the use of the robotic system. The scope of the current review are works in which robots are used as didactic tools for the education of professionals in health sciences, investigating the enablers and barriers that affect the use of robots as learning facilitators. Systematic literature searches were conducted in WOS and Scopus, yielding a total of 3812 candidate papers. After removing duplicates, inclusion criteria were defined and applied, resulting in 171 papers. An in-depth quality assessment was then performed leading to 26 papers for qualitative synthesis. Results show that robots in health sciences education are still developed with a roboticist mindset, without clearly incorporating aspects of the teaching/learning process. However, they have proven potential to be used in health sciences as they allow to parameterize procedures, autonomously guide learners to achieve greater engagement, or enable collective learning including patients and instructors "in the loop". Although there exist documented added-value benefits, further research and efforts needs to be done to foster the inclusion of robots as didactic tools in the curricula of health sciences professionals. On the one hand, by analyzing how robotic technology should be developed to become more flexible and usable to support both teaching and learning processes in health sciences education, as final users are not necessarily well-versed in how to use it. On the other, there continues to be a need to develop effective and standard robotic enhanced learning evaluation tools, as well good quality studies that describe effective evaluation of robotic enhanced education for professionals in health sciences. As happens with other technologies when applied to the health sciences field, studies often fail to provide sufficient detail to support transferability or direct future robotic health care education programs.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%