1979
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1979.tb00701.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preliminaries to a psychology of inference

Abstract: This paper presents a general pretheoretical framework for the study of inference. The framework is that of Social Judgment Theory which has been developed from Brunswik's probabilistic functionalism. The first section discusses the fundamental theoretical ideas and methodological principles. Important among these is the stress on the need to study the relation between the cognitive system and the inference task using parallel concepts for describing the cognitive system and the task, the theory of cognitive t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have expressed a commitment to the method of representative design, which, they argue, differentiates them from other researchers in cognitive psychology in general and judgment and decision making in particular (e.g., see B. Brehmer, 1979;Cooksey, 1996;Hammond et al, 1975;Hammond & Wascoe, 1980;Hastie & Hammond, 1991). For instance, Hastie and Hammond (1991) claimed that "the Lens model researchers' commitment to 'representative design' is explicit (and enthusiastic)" (p. 498).…”
Section: Social Judgment Theory Policy Capturing and The Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have expressed a commitment to the method of representative design, which, they argue, differentiates them from other researchers in cognitive psychology in general and judgment and decision making in particular (e.g., see B. Brehmer, 1979;Cooksey, 1996;Hammond et al, 1975;Hammond & Wascoe, 1980;Hastie & Hammond, 1991). For instance, Hastie and Hammond (1991) claimed that "the Lens model researchers' commitment to 'representative design' is explicit (and enthusiastic)" (p. 498).…”
Section: Social Judgment Theory Policy Capturing and The Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…387 expressed a commitment to the method of representative design, which, they argue, differentiates them from other researchers in cognitive psychology, in general, and judgment and decision making, in particular (e.g., see Brehmer, 1979;Cooksey, 1996;Hastie & Harnmond, 1991, p. 498). In light of their explicit commitment to the method of representative design, we were surprised to find that a !arge proportion of studies (those thatrelied on formal situational sampling; see Harnmond, 1966) often failed to represent the ecological properties toward which generalizations were intended.…”
Section: W/zieh World Should Be Represented In Representative Design?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paradigm, also known as probabilistic category learning, has been applied in numerous areas of psychology, including human judgment (Brehmer, 1979; …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paradigm, also known as probabilistic category learning, has been applied in numerous areas of psychology, including human judgment (Brehmer, 1979;Doherty & Kurz, 1996;Klayman, 1988; for a review see Goldstein, 2004), learning and memory (Gluck & Bower, 1988;Knowlton, Squire, & Gluck, 1994;Shanks, 1990), neuroscience (Ashby & Ell, 2001;Poldrack et al, 2001), and social cognition (Gavanski & Hoffman, 1987;Rappoport & Summers, 1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%