1973
DOI: 10.1525/aa.1973.75.1.02a00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prejudice and Its Intellectual Effect in American Anthropology: An Ethnographic Report1

Abstract: This article deals with some deep forms o f prejudice in American anthropology in terms o f its dominant ideas and its products. The foundation o f this prejudice seems to be Western individualism. I t expresses itself by excluding contrary ideas from its public forums (publications, symposia, and so forth) and by elaborating and escalating ideas in conformity with it. In spite of its cross-cultural protestations, American anthropology will become White American anthropology unless our fraternity consciously t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

1973
1973
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there may be other reasons as well including the venues for such communication and the cultural attitudes toward each other. As Francis L. K. Hsu (Hsu 1973) pointed out about the effect of "white anthropology," there was the assumption among both white and non-white scholars that non-white anthropologists could at best only collect data, but could not analyze that data. As a result, in the volumes edited by European and American scholars on "world folklore/folkloristics" or related to "Chinese folklore/folkloristics," the descriptions lack either critical insight or relevant depth, and often are not written by Chinese experts on the topics.…”
Section: Development and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there may be other reasons as well including the venues for such communication and the cultural attitudes toward each other. As Francis L. K. Hsu (Hsu 1973) pointed out about the effect of "white anthropology," there was the assumption among both white and non-white scholars that non-white anthropologists could at best only collect data, but could not analyze that data. As a result, in the volumes edited by European and American scholars on "world folklore/folkloristics" or related to "Chinese folklore/folkloristics," the descriptions lack either critical insight or relevant depth, and often are not written by Chinese experts on the topics.…”
Section: Development and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the twenty‐first century, anthropologists continue to contribute to public and intellectual dialogues about the enduring significance of race, such as the ongoing RACE traveling exhibit. However, as “white public space” (Brodkin, Morgen, and Hutchinson , 545), anthropology still has a long road to travel before the demographic composition of the discipline reflects the diversity of its constituents “at home” (Hsu ). In our sample (Table ), 735 of the 967 professional respondents who answered the question about race and ethnicity were white.…”
Section: Toward a Synthetic And Inclusive Twenty‐first‐century Anthromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The social sciences have also come under attack from a variety of other national and international sources for being primarily oriented toward the white, Western world (Abdi 1975;Horton 1967;Hsu 1973). The soul-searching among social scientists coincides with a small but significant move toward a more open-minded approach in the perception and descriptions of other cultures among psychologists in the Western world.…”
Section: Inadequacy Of Western Approaches Applied To Other Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%