1963
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(16)35254-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pregnancy and labor following cesarean section

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…His concern was an attempt to avoid the first cesarean, thus reducing the significant risk of future surgeries. By the early 1960s, repeat cesareans became accepted as standard practice in the United States (2). As surgical and anesthesia techniques improved, indications for performing cesarean births relaxed, and the rate of cesarean delivery increased from 5% in 1970 to nearly 25% by 1988 (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His concern was an attempt to avoid the first cesarean, thus reducing the significant risk of future surgeries. By the early 1960s, repeat cesareans became accepted as standard practice in the United States (2). As surgical and anesthesia techniques improved, indications for performing cesarean births relaxed, and the rate of cesarean delivery increased from 5% in 1970 to nearly 25% by 1988 (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risks of uterine rupture with previous classical incision have ranged from as high as 12% 6,7 to as low as 1% for women undergoing trial of labor. 8 In the MFMU Network study, 2 uterine ruptures were recorded in 105 women (1.9%) with a previous classical, inverted T, or J incision who either presented in advanced labor or refused repeat cesarean section. 5 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has cited a uterine rupture risk of 4%-9% for women with prior cesarean undergoing trial of labor and thus such practice is contraindicated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1963, Douglas et al documented the risk of uterine rupture during trial of labour after previous caesarean section to be 0.17%. 2 Between the 1960s and 1980s, several studies concluded that vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) was a reasonable option. 3 risk of perinatal death from attempted VBAC was 1.4 per 10,000 (95% CI 0-9.8), and in only 5% of uterine ruptures did the baby die.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%