2014
DOI: 10.5387/fms.2014-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pregnancy and Birth Survey After the Great East Japan Earthquake and Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident in Fukushima Prefecture

Abstract: : Background : On 11 March 2011, the Great East Japan Earthquake followed by a powerful tsunami hit the Pacific Coast of Northeast Japan and damaged Tokyo Electric Power Company's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, causing a radiation hazard in Fukushima Prefecture. The objective of this report is to describe some results of a questionnaire -based pregnancy and birth survey conducted by the Radiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey. Materials and Methods : Questionnaires w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
68
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(13 reference statements)
2
68
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is limited understanding of maternal and perinatal health following this disaster. There has been mixed evidence for immediate post-disaster changes in birth outcomes; some previous studies have found no increased proportions of low birthweight or preterm births in areas affected by the earthquake and tsunami [29], or in areas additionally affected by the nuclear disaster [30,31,32], in the first year post-disaster. However, there have also been findings of a slight increase in low birthweight neonates to women that had been 28–36 weeks pregnant at the time of the earthquake, in earthquake- and tsunami-affected areas [29], and increased proportions of low birthweight and preterm birth to women who conceived within six months post-disaster in areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is limited understanding of maternal and perinatal health following this disaster. There has been mixed evidence for immediate post-disaster changes in birth outcomes; some previous studies have found no increased proportions of low birthweight or preterm births in areas affected by the earthquake and tsunami [29], or in areas additionally affected by the nuclear disaster [30,31,32], in the first year post-disaster. However, there have also been findings of a slight increase in low birthweight neonates to women that had been 28–36 weeks pregnant at the time of the earthquake, in earthquake- and tsunami-affected areas [29], and increased proportions of low birthweight and preterm birth to women who conceived within six months post-disaster in areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the present study, we selected histological CAM cases treated in two tertiary fetal medicine units led by obstetricians with equivalent training, and using a standardized method of pathological examination of the placenta and cord. Our study also showed a higher prevalence of fetal anomalies (9.1%) than that in the entire Fukushima Prefecture (2.7%) during the same period (Fujimori et al 2014). The difference in prevalence may be a result of the study design and selection bias from tertiary fetal medicine units.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In addition to standard care needed for this vulnerable group of women, healthcare professionals should improve their communication skills regarding the effects of radiation on pregnancy, which mothers were particularly worried about. It would be important to communicate local data, such as that the Pregnancy and Birth Survey of the Fukushima Health Management reported no significant radiation impact on pregnancy outcomes after the Great East Japan Earthquake and Fukushima NPP accident 8) . This report has the following limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pregnancy and Birth Survey was included in the Fukushima Health Management Survey as described in a previous report 7,8) . Briefly, the subjects of this investigation were women receiving a maternity health record book from Fukushima prefecture from August 1 2010 to July 31 2011.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%