2017
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14050542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Birth Outcomes after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Disaster: A Long-Term Retrospective Study

Abstract: Changes in population birth outcomes, including increases in low birthweight or preterm births, have been documented after natural and manmade disasters. However, information is limited following the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Disaster. In this study, we assessed whether there were long-term changes in birth outcomes post-disaster, compared to pre-disaster data, and whether residential area and food purchasing patterns, as proxy measurements of evacuation and radiation-related anxiety, were ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29 The study by Leppold et al also failed to find any significant changes in preterm delivery and LBW rate after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster, compared with the preceding years. 30 Many factors other than prenatal stress play a role in pregnancy outcome, the integration of which determines the LBW rate; moreover, it is likely that the women in both areas of our study had experienced stress to some extent, and this might have led to the nonsignificant difference between them for LBW rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…29 The study by Leppold et al also failed to find any significant changes in preterm delivery and LBW rate after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster, compared with the preceding years. 30 Many factors other than prenatal stress play a role in pregnancy outcome, the integration of which determines the LBW rate; moreover, it is likely that the women in both areas of our study had experienced stress to some extent, and this might have led to the nonsignificant difference between them for LBW rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…There was no increased LBWp in any year from 2011 onward. However, with 4 years before/after the accident, i.e., 140 births per year, which means about 10 LBW-births per year, it was unlikely to receive a meaningful result, i.e., there is a large type-2 error probability in this study [39]. A more recent investigation considered 12,804 maternal outcomes during 2011-2014 in the Fukushima Prefecture [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Among the investigations after the Fukushima nuclear accidents, there are reports that LBW is increasing and reports that deny the increase. In the following we shortly address two reports that are questionnaire-4 based surveys with a response rate in the 50% range and one survey of a small number of births in one clinic in Fukushima [38][39][40]. Questionnaire-based studies are prone to selection bias and studies with small populations (mostly in clinical settings) may likely entail type-2 errors [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the few existing studies of prolonged effects of disasters on reproductive outcomes among the survivors reported mixed results, with one showing negative effects among women exposed to the 2001 World Trade Center disaster in Unites States [ 10 ] and another showing no effects among the women experienced the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in Japan [ 11 ]. Thus, the long-term effects of disasters remain unclear and are worthy of further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%