Pregnancy after 35

Abstract

Abstract:Advanced maternal age is associated with certain pregnancy-related risks. Being "at risk" causes anxiety and concern, which older pregnant women try to ease by being as well-informed as possible. This may be overwhelming to some women due to the large amount of information available. It is important for healthcare providers to be aware of the different feelings and experiences of older pregnant women in order to meet their individual needs within the maternity services.

The Correlation of Maternal Age and the Incidence of Preeclampsia at Aura Syifa Hospital

“…Compared to pregnant women at a healthy age, complications experienced by pregnant women aged 35 years and over increased during pregnancy including gestational diabetes, placenta previa, preeclampsia, miscarriage, and others. Mothers who have the age of 35 years and above are more worried about the development of their fetus because they know the risk conditions faced, thus leading to prolonged stress conditions.. (Singal et al, 2015).…”

Targeted Learning for Pre-Analysis Plans in Public Health and Health Policy Research

“…It has been noted that the amount of detail supplied in studies registered at EGAP varies, despite using the same form. Dr. Macartan Humphreys, Executive Director at EGAP and Professor in the Department of Political Science at Columbia University, was quoted regarding an EGAP pre-analysis plan filed by Michael LaCour, saying it was "missing a lot of detail one might like to see in a registered design" (Singal, 2015). It has also been asserted that LaCour may have fabricated a second pre-analysis plan after publication of his studies; one he claimed was filed a priori (Singal, 2015).…”

“…Dr. Macartan Humphreys, Executive Director at EGAP and Professor in the Department of Political Science at Columbia University, was quoted regarding an EGAP pre-analysis plan filed by Michael LaCour, saying it was "missing a lot of detail one might like to see in a registered design" (Singal, 2015). It has also been asserted that LaCour may have fabricated a second pre-analysis plan after publication of his studies; one he claimed was filed a priori (Singal, 2015). While perhaps an extreme example, considering the later retraction of the paper associated with the LaCour studies due to scientific misconduct (McNutt, 2015;Broockman et al, 2015), it remains a stark illustration of how pre-analysis plans cannot prevent possible scientific fraud, but rather provide transparency in the spirit of open science.…”