2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prefrontal and amygdala engagement during emotional reactivity and regulation in generalized anxiety disorder

Abstract: Individuals with GAD exhibited over-engagement of amygdala and frontal regions during the viewing of negative images, compared to HCs. Together, these aberrations may indicate that deficits in emotional reactivity rather than regulation contribute to emotion dysregulation in those with GAD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 68 Normal activation in the dlPFC may not be affected because of help from other brain areas of the frontoparietal network. Behavior studies have shown that patients with anxiety disorder can successfully down-regulate their negative emotion, 43 , 44 which may be in line with the above putative mechanism by which the activity of the dlPFC is not affected. Second, although in their review Zilverstand et al 3 reported abnormal activity in the dlPFC in anxiety disorders, they did not conduct a meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive description of the neurobiological underpinnings of cognitive emotion dysregulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“… 68 Normal activation in the dlPFC may not be affected because of help from other brain areas of the frontoparietal network. Behavior studies have shown that patients with anxiety disorder can successfully down-regulate their negative emotion, 43 , 44 which may be in line with the above putative mechanism by which the activity of the dlPFC is not affected. Second, although in their review Zilverstand et al 3 reported abnormal activity in the dlPFC in anxiety disorders, they did not conduct a meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive description of the neurobiological underpinnings of cognitive emotion dysregulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…While one study showed reduced effective connectivity in the amygdala (Qiao et al., 2017 [frontal gyrus seeds]), and another observed reduced FC between the right and left amygdala (Liu et al., 2015), all other FC results were greater for GAD (albeit with inconsistent seed regions; Andreescu et al., 2015; Buff et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2015; Mohlman et al., 2017; Qiao et al., 2017) and spanning all age groups. Finally, the majority of task results ( n = 11) indicated greater amygdala activity for subjects with GAD for passive (Fitzgerald et al., 2017; Hölzel et al., 2013; McClure et al., 2007; Nitschke et al., 2009), congruency (Etkin et al., 2010; Etkin and Schatzberg, 2011; Fonzo et al., 2015, 2014; Monk et al., 2008; Price et al., 2011), and emotion modulation (Mohlman et al., 2017) tasks, while only a few studies in adults ( n = 2) showed reduced activity for subjects with GAD in passive (Carlson et al., 2017) and congruency (Blair et al., 2012) tasks. One study investigating high uncertainty observed both increased and decreased activity in the amygdala (Yassa et al., 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Fitzgerald et al114 demonstrated that emotion regulation disturbances in GAD involve excessive reactivity to negative stimuli and a failure to effectively downregulate negative affective states. The authors reported that GAD patients engaged the left amygdala to a greater extent while viewing negative images, which suggests that these patients are more responsive to negative stimuli.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%