1999
DOI: 10.1109/12.752653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prefetching using Markov predictors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
280
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
280
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(This is similar to the miss correlation in [6,11].) In measuring the locality, up to four successors of each reference are kept based on the LRU replacement.…”
Section: Coterminous Group and Localitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(This is similar to the miss correlation in [6,11].) In measuring the locality, up to four successors of each reference are kept based on the LRU replacement.…”
Section: Coterminous Group and Localitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior correlation-based predictors (e.g. Markov predictor [11,6] and Global History Buffer [20]) record and use past miss correlations to predict future cache misses. However, a huge history table or FIFO is usually needed to provide decent coverage.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another proposed class of prefetchers utilizes address correlation [3,4,10,11,15,20], which promises wider applicability across a diverse spectrum of workloads because they target generalized memory access patterns. Rather than detecting patterns in data layout, these prefetchers correlate data addresses to predict future misses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6] Figure 1a illustrates conventional We propose an alternative structure, shown in Figure 1b, for holding prefetch history. In this structure, a fixed-length FIFO table, the global history buffer (GHB) holds cache miss addresses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%