2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2016.08.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preferential imitation can invalidate targeted subsidy policies on seasonal-influenza diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is widely used in identifying the spreading capacity of nodes by scholars and adopted in the study of vaccination strategy and infection control [27][28][29] as well. In principle, the SIR model detects the influential vertices due to the fact that key nodes are more likely to play an indispensable role in information Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 3 and viral transmission, and thereby an effective ranking is supposed to stand the test of real spreading coverage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely used in identifying the spreading capacity of nodes by scholars and adopted in the study of vaccination strategy and infection control [27][28][29] as well. In principle, the SIR model detects the influential vertices due to the fact that key nodes are more likely to play an indispensable role in information Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 3 and viral transmission, and thereby an effective ranking is supposed to stand the test of real spreading coverage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After that, Zhang et al [37] demonstrated that the hubs may largely inhibit the outbreaks of infectious diseases under the voluntary vaccination policy. In the meantime, various subsidy policies on controlling the epidemic spreading have been determined from the socioeconomic perspectives within the well-mixed and networked population [38][39][40][41][42][43] . Furthermore, most previous works [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] often assume that the vaccine has a perfect efficacy, which will endow the complete immunity for the inoculated individuals, but an interesting topic is on how the epidemic spreads when the vaccine is not fully effective for the disease (i.e., 100% efficacy)?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spontaneous protection of the public, combined with some compulsory measures implemented by governments or departments of health and hygiene, effectively controlled the spread of the disease [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. about the researches on the effect of individual behavior on the transmission of disease attracted much attention [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. For example, Funk et al studied the effect of locally spreading awareness on the transmission of disease, and they found that in a well-mixed population, the spread of awareness can reduce the size of the outbreak, but cannot enhance the transmission of threshold [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%